Realme X50 5G vs. vivo X50e: A Deep Dive into the Snapdragon 765G Experience
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially slightly better battery optimization, the vivo X50e emerges as the winner. Its 33W charging offers a tangible benefit over the Realme X50 5G’s 30W, making top-ups quicker and more convenient. However, the Realme X50 5G remains a strong contender, especially if found at a significantly lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme X50 5G (China) | vivo X50e |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE (4CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, January 07. Released 2020, January | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.1 x 75 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 200.4 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, Funtouch 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/3.0, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh, non-removable | 4350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glacier, Polar | Black, Blue |
| Models | RMX2051, RMX2025 | V1930 |
| Price | About 680 EUR | About 410 EUR |
Realme X50 5G (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Identical CPU/GPU performance to vivo X50e
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 30W charging
- Missing detailed display specifications
- Camera performance is unknown
vivo X50e
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially optimized power efficiency
- 5G connectivity
- Likely higher price than Realme X50 5G
- Identical CPU/GPU performance to Realme X50 5G
- Missing detailed display specifications
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market positioning, we can infer both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding refresh rates (60Hz vs 90Hz) or HDR support is notable. The user experience will likely be similar in terms of visual quality, with the potential for minor differences in color calibration depending on each brand’s tuning.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent beyond the chipsets' ISP capabilities. Given the market segment, both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the sensor sizes and lens apertures are unknown. Image processing algorithms will differ between Realme and vivo, resulting in distinct photo styles. Without specific sensor information, it’s impossible to determine a clear camera advantage. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G (7 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration: 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical between the two. The GPU performance will also be the same. Thermal management will likely depend on the internal cooling solutions, which are not specified, but the 7nm process node offers reasonable efficiency. The lack of LPDDR5x RAM specification suggests both likely use LPDDR4X, limiting potential memory bandwidth gains.
Battery Life
While the exact battery capacities are not provided, the charging wattage is a key differentiator. The vivo X50e boasts 33W wired charging, promising a faster top-up compared to the Realme X50 5G’s 30W. Vivo claims a 70% charge in 30 minutes for the Realme X50 5G, while the X50e should achieve a similar or slightly faster result. This difference, while not massive, translates to less downtime and greater convenience for users who frequently need to recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme X50 5G (China) if you need a capable 5G phone and are on a strict budget, willing to trade a bit of charging speed for potential cost savings. Buy the vivo X50e if you prioritize faster charging, potentially slightly improved power efficiency, and a more refined overall user experience, even if it means spending a little more.