OnePlus 8T+ 5G vs Realme X50 5G: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly better performance, especially in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and its 65W charging is substantially faster. While the Realme X50 5G offers a compelling value proposition, the performance gap is too significant to ignore for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme X50 5G (China) | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, January 07. Released 2020, January | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/3.0, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glacier, Polar | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | RMX2051, RMX2025 | KB2007 |
| Price | About 680 EUR | About 640 EUR |
Realme X50 5G (China)
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower performance than the OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Slower 30W charging
- Limited availability outside of China
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 865
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Advanced ISP for better camera performance
- Higher price tag
- Potential for more heat generation under heavy load
- May not be available in all regions
Display Comparison
While specific display specs beyond chipset are unavailable for the Realme X50 5G, both devices likely feature high refresh rate panels common in their price brackets. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G benefits from the Snapdragon 865’s superior image signal processor (ISP), potentially enhancing display-related features like HDR processing. The 7nm+ fabrication process of the Snapdragon 865 also contributes to more efficient power consumption, potentially translating to slightly better battery life during display-intensive tasks.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Realme X50 5G, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 865 in the OnePlus 8T+ 5G offers a more advanced ISP, enabling features like faster autofocus, improved low-light performance, and better video stabilization. The 865’s processing capabilities allow for more complex computational photography algorithms, resulting in more detailed and dynamic images. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the OnePlus benefits from the superior image processing pipeline of its chipset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) boasts a significantly faster CPU configuration – a 2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core versus the Realme X50 5G’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime. This, coupled with the 865’s more powerful Adreno 650 GPU compared to the 765G’s Adreno 620, results in a substantial performance advantage for the OnePlus in graphically demanding applications and games. The Snapdragon 865 also supports faster RAM speeds (LPDDR5 vs potentially LPDDR4X in the Realme), further boosting performance. The 765G is still capable, but will exhibit more noticeable slowdowns under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Realme X50 5G’s 30W charging is respectable, achieving 70% charge in 30 minutes. However, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s 65W Warp Charge is a game-changer, delivering a full 100% charge in just 39 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime and offers a significantly more convenient charging experience. While battery capacity isn’t specified for the Realme, the more efficient Snapdragon 865 in the OnePlus 8T+ 5G could offset a potentially larger battery in the Realme, resulting in comparable real-world battery life despite the faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme X50 5G (China) if you prioritize affordability and 5G connectivity on a tight budget, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you demand smoother performance for gaming, content creation, or multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 65W charging, even at a higher price point.