Realme X3 vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the superior choice. Its faster 65W charging, coupled with the more advanced Snapdragon 865 chipset, provides a smoother and more efficient experience. While the Realme X3 offers excellent value, the 8T+ 5G’s improvements justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme X3 | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 25. Released 2020, June 30 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 51mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 55 min | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Arctic White | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | RMX2142, RMX2081, RMX2085, RMX2083 | KB2007 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 640 EUR |
Realme X3
- Excellent value for money
- Capable Snapdragon 855+ performance
- Still a solid performer for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (55 minutes)
- Older chipset lacks 5G support
- Potentially less refined camera processing
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Faster 65W charging (39 minutes)
- More powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Higher price point
- May experience some thermal throttling under sustained load
- Potentially less aggressive pricing than the X3
Display Comparison
While display specs aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, common for their respective price brackets. However, the Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) in the 8T+ 5G could contribute to slightly better color accuracy and dynamic range when viewing content. The Realme X3, being an older model, may have slightly larger bezels, impacting the overall screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, we can infer differences based on the chipsets. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP supports more advanced image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range in the OnePlus 8T+ 5G. The 865 also supports higher resolution video recording. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the 8T+ 5G’s image processing pipeline will likely deliver more refined results. The Realme X3's camera will still be competent, but won't match the 8T+'s capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) represents a generational leap over the Realme X3’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm). The 865 features the newer Cortex-A77 cores, offering improved single-core performance, and a more efficient Adreno 650 GPU. While both chips are octa-core, the 865’s architecture provides a noticeable advantage in sustained performance and thermal management. The 8T+ 5G also benefits from potentially faster RAM (likely LPDDR5 vs LPDDR4X in the X3), further enhancing responsiveness. The 855+ is still capable, but will show its age in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Realme X3 offers 30W wired charging, reaching 100% in 55 minutes. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G significantly improves on this with 65W charging, achieving a full charge in just 39 minutes. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the 8T+ 5G effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme X3 if you prioritize maximizing performance-per-dollar and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for budget-conscious gamers and users who don’t require 5G connectivity. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you value faster charging, a more modern chipset with 5G support, and a generally more polished user experience. This phone is best for users who demand quick power-ups and future-proof connectivity.