Realme X2 Pro vs. Poco F5: A Clash of Flagship and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 offers a more modern chipset and brighter display, while the X2 Pro boasts a slightly faster charging speed and potentially better long-term battery endurance. Ultimately, the Poco F5 provides a better balance of performance and features for its price, making it the winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme X2 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October 15. Released 2019, October | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| 64GB UFS 2.1, 128/256GB UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with Dolby Atmos stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio (incl. speakers) | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 100% in 35 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar White, Neptune Blue, Red Master Edition, Gray Master Edition | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | RMX1931 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -91.3dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 94h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 82dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 91dB | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 396827 (v7), 467653 (v8) GeekBench: 10373 (v4.4) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Realme X2 Pro
- Excellent battery endurance (94h)
- Fast 50W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 855+ chipset (still capable)
- Good build quality
- Older chipset compared to Poco F5
- Lower display brightness
- Camera may show its age
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Modern Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Bright 963 nits display
- Faster 67W charging
- Excellent value for money
- Battery endurance slightly lower than X2 Pro (118h endurance rating)
- Build quality may not be as premium as X2 Pro
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight compared to the X2 Pro. Both have 'infinite' contrast ratios (a nominal claim), but the Poco F5's brightness advantage is undeniable. The X2 Pro's display is still good, but lacks the Poco F5's punch.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively declare a winner without detailed testing. Both phones feature Photo/Video capabilities. However, the Poco F5's newer image processing pipeline likely provides an edge in image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The X2 Pro's camera is still capable, but may show its age.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a clear winner here. While the X2 Pro's Snapdragon 855+ was a flagship chip in its time, the 7+ Gen 2 offers improved efficiency and performance thanks to its 4nm process. Expect smoother multitasking and better gaming performance on the Poco F5.
Battery Life
The X2 Pro's endurance rating of 94h is impressive, suggesting excellent long-term battery life. The Poco F5's active use score of 11:52h is respectable, and its 67W charging is faster than the X2 Pro's 50W. While the X2 Pro *might* have slightly better overall endurance, the Poco F5 charges faster.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Realme X2 Pro? Users prioritizing raw charging speed and potentially longer battery life (based on endurance rating) might consider it. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Those seeking a modern, powerful chipset, a vibrant display, and excellent value for money will find the Poco F5 a compelling choice.