Realme V60 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a vibrant display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its 10:28h active use score and 1073 nits peak brightness significantly outperform the V60 Pro. However, the Realme V60 Pro’s 45W charging offers a quicker top-up when needed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme V60 pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 28 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 28 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 625 nits | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 5W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Crystal Black, Golden Glow, Jewel Red | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme V60 pro
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Potentially more streamlined software experience (Realme UI)
- Competitive price point
- Likely shorter battery life compared to Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 40 Neo
- Limited camera information
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright 1073 nits display
- Potentially better camera system
- Slower charging speed (though still fast)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Motorola's software can be divisive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Realme V60 Pro, which lacks published brightness data. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the brighter display of the Edge 40 Neo will be more comfortable for extended use in bright environments. The panel technology isn't specified for either, but the Edge 40 Neo's brightness suggests a higher-quality panel.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited regarding camera capabilities. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a more comprehensive camera system. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume Motorola’s image processing algorithms are more mature, given their longer history in the smartphone market. The V60 Pro’s camera is likely adequate for everyday use, but the Edge 40 Neo likely offers more versatility and potentially better image quality.
Performance
Both phones utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 has a slight edge in CPU performance. Its Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, offer a modest performance increase over the V60 Pro’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. While both have 6x Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the 7030’s architecture translates to slightly smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming performance. The V60 Pro's performance is still very capable, but the Edge 40 Neo has a theoretical advantage.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h active use score and an 80-hour endurance rating. While the Realme V60 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 45W charging is faster than the Edge 40 Neo’s, which can reach 50% charge in 15 minutes. This means the V60 Pro can recover from a low battery faster, but the Edge 40 Neo will likely last longer on a single charge. The Edge 40 Neo’s superior endurance makes it ideal for users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V60 Pro if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly replenish battery levels and value a streamlined software experience. It’s ideal for users who prioritize convenience over extended battery life. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery performance, a brighter, more visible display in sunlight, and a more balanced feature set. This phone is best for users who are less concerned with the absolute fastest charging speeds.