Realme V5 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders

The Realme V5 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset selection and feature prioritization. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Realme V5 5G emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 720, built on a 7nm process, offers a slight edge in CPU performance, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Moto G 5G’s endurance rating is identical, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing sustained usage.

PHONES
Phone Names Realme V5 5G Motorola Moto G 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
5G bands1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5G 2.3 Gbps DLHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -
Launch
Announced2020, August 03. Released 2020, August 072020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions162.1 x 75 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 2.95 x 0.36 in)166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight194 g (6.84 oz)212 g (7.48 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass-
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, HDR10
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC3Adreno 619
OSAndroid 10, Realme UIAndroid 10
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 UFS 2.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Triple-48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
 24-bit/192kHz audio-
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioNoFM radio, RDS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging30W wired, 100% in 65 min20W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlue, Silver, MintVolcanic Gray, Frosted Silver
PriceAbout 180 EURAbout 90 EUR
Tests
Battery life-Endurance rating 131h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1419:1
Loudspeaker- -28.1 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 312461 (v8) GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Realme V5 5G

  • Faster 30W charging for quicker top-ups.
  • Potentially stronger CPU performance with Dimensity 720.
  • 7nm process may offer competitive efficiency.

  • Display specifications are largely unknown.
  • Camera details are lacking, making it hard to assess quality.

Motorola Moto G 5G

  • Brighter display (484 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
  • Snapdragon 750G offers strong GPU performance.
  • Excellent 131-hour endurance rating.

  • Slower 20W charging.
  • 8nm process may run slightly warmer under load.

Display Comparison

Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility. While the Realme V5 5G’s display specifications are not provided, the Moto G 5G’s brightness level suggests a more usable experience in direct sunlight. The lack of information on the Realme V5 5G’s panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) and refresh rate leaves a gap in the comparison, but the Moto G 5G’s brightness is a clear win.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a meaningful comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both phones target the mid-range camera experience, relying on software processing to enhance image quality. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department, focusing instead on core functionality.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme V5 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7nm) while the Motorola Moto G 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm). The Snapdragon 750G, built on a slightly larger 8nm node, generally offers better GPU performance, making it more suitable for demanding games. However, the Dimensity 720’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, provide a competitive CPU performance, potentially leading to snappier app loading and multitasking. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 750G *should* offer better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions, but real-world testing would be needed to confirm this.

Battery Life

Interestingly, both the Realme V5 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an identical endurance rating of 131 hours. This suggests similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds diverge significantly: the Realme V5 5G supports 30W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 65 minutes, while the Moto G 5G is limited to 20W, implying a slower charging time. This faster charging capability gives the Realme V5 5G a practical advantage, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Realme V5 5G if you need a phone that charges quickly and offers a bit more CPU horsepower for multitasking and light gaming. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on all-day battery life and a potentially more refined software experience, typical of Motorola’s near-stock Android approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 720 in the Realme V5 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Snapdragon 750G generally has a GPU advantage, the Dimensity 720 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings. Expect some frame drops during intense scenes, but the experience should be playable. Optimizations within the game and the phone's software will also play a role.
❓ How does the Motorola Moto G 5G's software experience compare to Realme UI?
Motorola is known for its near-stock Android experience, offering a cleaner interface with minimal bloatware. Realme UI, while feature-rich, often includes pre-installed apps and a more customized look. Users who prefer a simpler, more streamlined experience will likely favor the Moto G 5G, while those who enjoy customization options may prefer Realme UI.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a major concern?
Yes, it is. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or the presence of OIS, it's difficult to assess the camera performance accurately. Both phones likely offer a decent camera experience for casual photography, but don't expect flagship-level image quality.