The Realme V3 and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. Both devices leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, but key differences in processing power, display characteristics, and charging speeds dictate which phone is the better fit for different users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme V3 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Its slightly faster Dimensity 720 chipset and 18W charging offer a more responsive experience and quicker top-ups, despite the A22 5G's marginally brighter display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 01. Released 2020, September 10 | 2021, June 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1152p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver | Gray, White, Mint, Violet |
| Models | - | SM-A226B, SM-A226B/DS, SM-A226B/DSN, SM-A226BR, SM-A226BR/N, SM-A226L, SC-56B |
| Price | About 120 EUR | £ 92.00 / € 125.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 242155 (v8), 223188 (v9)
GeekBench: 6913 (v4.4), 1719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme V3
- Faster 18W charging for quicker top-ups
- Slightly more optimized Dimensity 720 chipset
- Potentially smoother user experience due to chipset optimization
- Display brightness is likely lower than the A22 5G
- Camera details are unknown, potentially lacking features
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Brighter display (385 nits) for better outdoor visibility
- Samsung One UI software experience
- Comparable battery life to the Realme V3
- Slower 15W charging
- Dimensity 700 chipset offers only a marginal performance boost
Display Comparison
Both the Realme V3 and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G feature displays with a 1631:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar levels of black depth and overall image quality. However, the Galaxy A22 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 385 nits, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both share the same contrast ratio (nominal), the real-world brightness advantage of the A22 5G is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. Details regarding panel technology (IPS vs. TFT) are missing, but given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCDs.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but specific sensor details are absent. Without knowing megapixel counts or sensor sizes, a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices suggests limited utility, as these sensors typically lack the resolution and dynamic range for truly detailed macro shots. Image processing will likely differ, with Samsung’s software prioritizing vibrant colors and contrast, while Realme often aims for a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization for video recording.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G’s Dimensity 700, with its 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, offers a modest clock speed advantage over the Realme V3’s Dimensity 720 (2.0 GHz Cortex-A76). This translates to slightly faster single-core performance, noticeable in app launch times and general responsiveness. Both chipsets utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, meaning multi-core performance will be relatively similar. The 7nm fabrication process is shared, so thermal throttling shouldn't be a significant differentiator. However, the V3's slightly optimized chipset could lead to better sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
Both the Realme V3 and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G achieve an endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage scenarios. However, the Realme V3’s 18W wired charging is a clear advantage over the A22 5G’s 15W charging. This faster charging speed will result in significantly shorter 0-100% charge times, a crucial benefit for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day. The identical endurance ratings suggest that despite potentially different battery capacities (unspecified), power efficiency is similar.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V3 if you prioritize a smoother user experience and faster charging, making it ideal for users who frequently multitask or game on the go. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G if you value a slightly brighter display and prefer the Samsung One UI software experience, and aren't overly concerned with maximizing performance within this budget segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 700 in the Galaxy A22 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to use medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The Realme V3’s Dimensity 720 is similarly capable, but sustained performance might be slightly better due to potential chipset optimizations. Neither phone is a dedicated gaming device.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 15W and 18W?
While a 3W difference may seem small, it translates to a noticeable reduction in charging time. The Realme V3’s 18W charging will likely shave off 30-60 minutes from a full 0-100% charge compared to the Galaxy A22 5G’s 15W charging, making it more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Are the 2MP macro cameras on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited image quality. They struggle with detail and dynamic range, often producing blurry or noisy results. They are best used for casual snapshots in ideal lighting conditions, but don't expect professional-level macro photography.
