The Realme V3 and Motorola Moto G 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded affordable 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different chipsets and feature sets. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and slightly better display characteristics, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the 20W charging offers a quicker top-up compared to the Realme V3’s 18W.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 01. Released 2020, September 10 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 312461 (v8)
GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme V3
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance (131h)
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 720)
- Slower charging (18W)
- Display brightness likely lower than Moto G 5G
Motorola Moto G 5G
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 750G)
- Faster charging (20W)
- Brighter display (484 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Battery endurance similar to Realme V3
- Camera details lacking
Display Comparison
Both devices feature a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, significantly outshining the Realme V3 (brightness data unavailable). This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Moto G 5G’s superior brightness makes it the more comfortable device for extended viewing sessions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Motorola’s generally more refined image processing, the Moto G 5G is likely to produce more consistently pleasing images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of detail regarding features like OIS suggests neither phone excels in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme V3 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7nm) while the Moto G 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm). The Snapdragon 750G, built on an 8nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and sustained performance. The CPU configuration also favors the Moto G 5G with its 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 cores versus the V3’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Motorola. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural advantages of the Kryo cores and the more efficient process node give the Moto G 5G a clear edge.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G’s 20W wired charging is faster than the Realme V3’s 18W charging. This means the Moto G 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed provides a practical advantage for users who frequently need to top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V3 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor for everyday tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and faster charging, even if it means spending a bit more upfront. The Moto G 5G is the better pick for media consumption due to its brighter display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 750G in the Moto G 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. The 8nm process also helps with thermal management during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 20W? Will I notice a real difference in daily use?
While 2W may not seem like a huge difference, the Motorola Moto G 5G’s 20W charging will noticeably reduce charging times. Expect a faster top-up, especially from 0-50%, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly recharge their phones throughout the day.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications a concern? Should I expect good image quality from either phone?
The lack of specifics is a drawback. However, Motorola generally offers more refined image processing than Realme at this price point. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but both phones will likely struggle in low-light scenarios without OIS or large sensors.
