The Realme V25 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G both target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market, offering a similar Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset. However, they diverge significantly in charging technology and overall user experience, making the choice less straightforward than a simple spec sheet comparison suggests. This analysis will dissect the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and minimizing downtime, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging capability dramatically reduces charging times compared to the Realme V25’s 33W, offsetting the identical battery endurance rating. While both phones share the same core performance, the Poco’s faster charging is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 03 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 04 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme V25
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 695 5G performance
- Decent battery endurance (119h)
- Slow 33W charging
- Lack of fast charging standards (PD3.0, QC3)
- Limited display information
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Excellent battery endurance (119h)
- Reliable Snapdragon 695 5G performance
- Potentially higher price point
- Limited display information
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. Without specific brightness data, it’s difficult to assess display quality beyond this. The absence of information regarding refresh rates or panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED) suggests both likely utilize standard 60Hz IPS LCDs, placing them behind competitors offering smoother visuals. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown, but likely comparable given the similar price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). The absence of this information makes a direct camera comparison impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both utilize a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
Both the Realme V25 and Poco X4 Pro 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The GPU performance will also be the same. The real-world performance difference will likely come down to thermal management, which is not specified. RAM type and speed (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) are unknown, but could influence multitasking responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both the Realme V25 and Poco X4 Pro 5G boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage scenarios. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Realme V25 offers 33W wired charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging, along with PD3.0 and QC3. This translates to a 70% charge in 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes for the Poco X4 Pro 5G, a substantial improvement over the Realme V25’s slower charging speed. This difference in charging speed is the most significant differentiator between the two devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V25 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for users who don’t mind overnight charging or infrequent top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging and want to spend less time tethered to a wall outlet. This phone is ideal for users who need a quick power boost throughout the day and appreciate the convenience of fast charging standards like PD3.0 and QC3.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Poco X4 Pro 5G's charging compared to the Realme V25 in real-world use?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, thanks to its 67W charging. The Realme V25, with its 33W charging, will take considerably longer – likely exceeding an hour to reach a full charge. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Will I notice a performance difference between the Realme V25 and Poco X4 Pro 5G when gaming?
Given both phones utilize the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration, you shouldn't expect a significant performance difference in gaming. However, sustained gaming performance could vary depending on the thermal management capabilities of each device, which are currently unknown. Both are capable of handling most mobile games at medium settings.
❓ Do either of these phones support expandable storage via microSD card?
This information is not provided in the specifications. However, given the target market and Xiaomi's history of including microSD card slots in their Poco devices, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is more likely to support expandable storage than the Realme V25.
