The Realme V23 and Oppo K10x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices target budget-conscious consumers, but diverge in their core hardware choices – the Realme opting for a Mediatek Dimensity 810, while the Oppo leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which phone delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Oppo K10x is the stronger choice. Its 67W charging, capable of reaching 80% in just 33 minutes, significantly outperforms the Realme V23’s 33W charging. However, the V23’s Dimensity 810 may offer a slight edge in sustained CPU performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 14 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 28 min | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gradient | Blue, Black |
| Models | - | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Realme V23
- Potentially stronger CPU performance with Dimensity 810
- Mediatek chipset may offer better value for money
- Realme UI is generally lightweight and customizable
- Slower 33W charging
- Camera performance is unknown and potentially average
- Battery capacity not specified
Oppo K10x
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 offers efficient performance
- Oppo’s image processing is often well-regarded
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds compared to the V23
- May be slightly more expensive than the Realme V23
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the price bracket, both devices likely feature LCD panels with 60Hz refresh rates. The user experience will likely hinge on color calibration and peak brightness, areas where Oppo historically performs well. Bezels are also likely to be similar, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over ultra-slim designs.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent beyond the existence of cameras. Given the target market, both phones likely feature a primary sensor around 50MP, accompanied by depth and macro lenses of questionable utility. Image processing will be a key differentiator. Oppo’s image processing algorithms are generally tuned for vibrant, social media-ready photos, while Realme tends towards a more natural look. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme V23’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a dual-cluster CPU configuration with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Oppo K10x utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 810’s higher clocked A76 cores suggest a potential advantage in single-core performance and burst workloads. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon typically excels in sustained performance and modem efficiency. The K10x’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, while slightly slower clocked, are architecturally more efficient. RAM speed is not specified, but both likely utilize LPDDR4X to keep costs down. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 695’s efficiency may lead to less throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the charging speeds tell a significant story. The Oppo K10x’s 67W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising an 80% charge in 33 minutes. The Realme V23’s 33W charging, while respectable, takes longer to reach a comparable charge level (50% in 28 minutes). This difference in charging speed translates directly to user convenience. A larger battery in the V23 could partially offset the slower charging, but the K10x’s faster replenishment is a compelling benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V23 if you prioritize a potentially more responsive CPU for everyday tasks and light gaming, and aren't overly concerned with charging speed. Buy the Oppo K10x if you value significantly faster charging, allowing you to quickly top up your battery and minimize downtime, even if it means a slight trade-off in peak CPU performance. Both are excellent choices for users on a budget seeking 5G connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset for mid-range gaming, but it's not a flagship performer. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve smooth frame rates in demanding titles like PUBG or Call of Duty. The Dimensity 810 in the Realme V23 might offer a slight edge in sustained gaming performance, but both phones will require some compromise.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the 33W charging on the Realme V23 in real-world use?
The Oppo K10x’s 67W charging is substantially faster. While the Realme V23 reaches 50% in 28 minutes, the K10x achieves 80% in 33 minutes. This means a full charge on the K10x will take significantly less time overall, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
This information is not provided in the specifications. However, given the target market, it's likely that at least one of the phones offers microSD card support, allowing users to expand storage capacity. Check the official product pages for confirmation.
