Realme V15 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and incredibly fast charging, the Realme V15 5G is the clear winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers a more refined display experience and comparable battery endurance, making it ideal for multimedia consumption and everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme V15 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 07 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 15 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.4 x 8.1 mm / 8.3 mm | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g / 179 g (6.21 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, 50% in 18 min, 100% in 47 min | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | 4310 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Silver, Nebula, Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A526B, SM-A526B/DS, SM-A5260, SM-A526W, SM-A526U, SM-A526U1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 137.39 / £ 280.00 / € 115.49 |
| SAR | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 111h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 334981 (v8), 386474 (v9) GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme V15 5G
- Significantly faster 50W charging
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 800U
- Aggressive pricing often makes it more affordable
- Display brightness and quality likely inferior to A52 5G
- Limited camera details available for thorough assessment
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Brighter and more color-accurate display (787 nits)
- Potentially better thermal management with Snapdragon 750G
- Samsung’s established camera software and image processing
- Slower 25W charging
- CPU performance slightly lower than Realme V15 5G
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 787 nits, compared to the Realme V15 5G (brightness data unavailable). This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the A52 5G’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite (nominal)’ – typical for AMOLED panels – the Realme V15’s panel type is unspecified, suggesting it’s likely an LCD. This difference impacts color vibrancy and black levels. The A52 5G’s display is better suited for media consumption and content creation where accurate color representation is crucial.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. Without specifics on sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the market positioning of Samsung typically prioritizes image processing and software enhancements, potentially resulting in more pleasing images in various conditions. The A52 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s established camera algorithms. The Realme V15 5G may rely more on hardware capabilities, which, without further data, are difficult to assess.
Performance
The Realme V15 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U, fabricated on a 7nm process, features a more aggressive CPU core configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76) than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570) built on an 8nm node. This suggests the V15 will deliver superior performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. However, the Snapdragon 750G’s 8nm process *could* offer better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to more sustained performance under prolonged load. The V15’s focus is on peak performance, while the A52 5G aims for consistent, efficient operation.
Battery Life
Both the Realme V15 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G achieve an endurance rating of 111 hours, indicating comparable overall battery life. However, their charging speeds differ dramatically. The Realme V15 5G’s 50W wired charging is significantly faster, reaching 50% charge in just 18 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. The A52 5G’s 25W charging takes 30 minutes to reach 50%, demonstrating a substantial difference in convenience. While both phones last roughly the same on a single charge, the V15’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V15 5G if you need a phone for demanding mobile games, frequent video editing, or simply value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display for streaming and photography, and prioritize a well-rounded, reliable experience over peak performance.