Realme V13 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly brighter display, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765 offers a more refined CPU architecture and a measured 543 nits of brightness, providing a smoother experience and better visibility in outdoor conditions. However, the Realme V13 5G is a viable alternative for those seeking a newer device at a potentially lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme V13 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 31 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 02 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | - | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme V13 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Latest Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Unspecified display brightness
- Less refined CPU architecture compared to Snapdragon 765
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- More balanced CPU architecture (Snapdragon 765)
- Faster charging (20W)
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 765)
- Potentially higher price
- Endurance rating is the same as the Realme
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, a significant advantage over the unlisted brightness of the Realme V13 5G, suggesting better outdoor visibility. Both share a 1269:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar levels of black depth and color pop. However, the lack of information regarding the Realme V13 5G’s panel technology (LCD vs AMOLED) and refresh rate leaves a question mark regarding its overall visual experience. The Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness is a clear win for users who consume content outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the market positioning of the Moto G 5G Plus suggests a greater emphasis on camera quality, potentially featuring a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, which can introduce artifacts in low-light conditions. The lack of information makes it impossible to determine a clear winner without further testing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme V13 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 700, while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G. While both are 7nm chips, the Snapdragon 765 employs a tri-cluster CPU configuration (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) offering a potentially more balanced performance profile than the Dimensity 700’s dual-cluster setup (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This architectural difference suggests the Snapdragon 765 may handle multitasking and demanding applications more efficiently. The Snapdragon 765 also benefits from Qualcomm’s established software optimization, potentially leading to smoother performance and better thermal management.
Battery Life
Both the Realme V13 5G (18W charging) and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (20W charging) achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the 20W charging on the Moto G 5G Plus translates to faster charging speeds, potentially reducing downtime. While both offer adequate battery life for a full day of moderate use, the faster charging of the Motorola provides a convenience advantage for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V13 5G if you need a phone with the latest Mediatek chipset and are comfortable with potentially less refined software optimization. It's ideal for users who frequently switch phones and want to stay current with hardware. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prefer a more polished user experience, a brighter display for outdoor use, and a proven chipset with a strong track record for stability and performance in everyday tasks.