The Realme V11 5G and Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G represent a sweet spot in the smartphone market – affordable 5G connectivity powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 700. Both devices aim to deliver a smooth experience without breaking the bank, but subtle differences in display technology and battery optimization could sway your decision. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a slightly brighter and more contrast-rich display, the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. However, the Realme V11 5G remains a compelling option, especially if price is the primary concern, as they share identical core performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 05 | 2021, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 05 | Available. Released 2021, May 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 8.4 mm thickness | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | RMX3121, RMX3122 | M2103K19PG, M2103K19PI, M2103K19PY |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1475:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.9 LUFS (Good)
|
Realme V11 5G
- Affordable price point
- Reliable Dimensity 700 performance
- 5G connectivity
- Display specifications are unknown
- Potentially lower battery optimization compared to Poco
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
- Brighter display with 536 nits peak brightness
- Higher contrast ratio (1475:1)
- Excellent 121-hour endurance rating
- May be slightly more expensive than Realme V11 5G
- 18W charging isn't the fastest available
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 536 nits and a 1475:1 contrast ratio, offering a noticeably more vibrant viewing experience compared to the Realme V11 5G, which lacks specific display data but is expected to be in a similar range given its market positioning. The 1475:1 contrast ratio on the Poco M3 Pro indicates deeper blacks and more defined highlights. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Poco’s measured brightness suggests better outdoor visibility. The nominal contrast ratio suggests a similar panel quality, but the measured value on the Poco provides more confidence.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms. This suggests a similar level of camera performance geared towards casual photography. Without further information, it’s difficult to differentiate their camera capabilities. The absence of details implies neither phone prioritizes advanced camera features, focusing instead on providing a functional camera experience for everyday use. The lack of mention of OIS suggests image stabilization will rely primarily on software.
Performance
Both the Realme V11 5G and Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical in day-to-day tasks and even in moderately demanding games. The shared chipset and core configuration suggest similar thermal profiles, though real-world sustained performance will depend on the devices’ cooling solutions, which are not specified. RAM configurations are not provided, but will significantly impact multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G has an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating excellent battery life. Both phones share the same 18W wired charging capability, meaning charging times will be comparable. While the Realme V11 5G’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Poco’s endurance rating suggests a well-optimized power management system. The 18W charging, while not exceptionally fast, is sufficient for topping up the battery overnight.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme V11 5G if you need a reliable 5G phone with a focus on affordability and aren't particularly demanding about display quality. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G if you prefer a more visually engaging experience with a brighter screen and slightly better contrast, and are willing to spend a little more for that improvement.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 700 in either phone struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. Both phones share the same chipset, so gaming performance will be comparable. Expect medium settings to provide a balanced experience.
❓ Is the 18W charging speed sufficient for daily use, or will I be waiting a long time to fully charge the battery?
18W charging is adequate for overnight charging, but it's not particularly fast. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours. The Poco M3 Pro's better battery optimization may offset the slower charging speed, providing longer usage between charges.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, should I expect significant differences in photo quality between these two phones?
No, don't expect dramatic differences in photo quality. Both phones likely utilize similar sensor and lens configurations. Image processing will play a role, but without more information, it's safe to assume their camera performance will be broadly similar for casual photography.
