The Realme Q5i and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balance of performance and affordability, but they take different approaches. The Q5i prioritizes processing power with its Dimensity 810, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G focuses on a more efficient Snapdragon 695 and significantly faster charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and rapid replenishment, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging dramatically outperforms the Q5i’s 33W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a solid, efficient experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 18 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 18 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 8.1 mm thickness | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | RMX3574 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Q5i
- Potentially higher CPU performance for demanding tasks.
- 6nm Dimensity 810 offers good power efficiency.
- Competitive price point.
- Slower 33W charging.
- Limited information on camera capabilities.
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3.
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 for all-day battery life.
- Potentially better thermal management.
- Slightly less powerful CPU compared to the Dimensity 810.
- Camera details are lacking.
- May not be ideal for hardcore gamers.
Display Comparison
Both the Realme Q5i and Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting they utilize IPS LCD panels. However, specific details like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price points, it’s likely both displays target a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture information, or details on image processing, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The usefulness of a 2MP macro lens on either device is questionable, offering limited detail and dynamic range. The image processing style will likely differ, with Realme often favoring vibrant colors and Xiaomi leaning towards more natural tones.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Q5i’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) features 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the Dimensity 810 has a clock speed advantage, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized architecture and potentially better thermal management. The Snapdragon 695 is known for its efficiency, which could translate to longer sustained performance under load. RAM speed is not specified, but both likely utilize LPDDR4X to balance cost and performance.
Battery Life
Both devices have an endurance rating of 119h, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Realme Q5i offers 33W wired charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts 67W wired charging with support for PD3.0 and QC3. This translates to a significantly faster charging experience for the Poco X4 Pro 5G: 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This is a major advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q5i if you frequently engage in demanding tasks like video editing or play graphically intensive games and prioritize raw processing speed. The Dimensity 810’s Cortex-A76 cores provide a performance edge. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value battery endurance, fast charging, and a consistently smooth experience for everyday use. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency and 67W charging make it ideal for users on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it can handle Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense combat. The Dimensity 810 in the Q5i will offer a smoother experience, but the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s efficiency may prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Realme Q5i in real-world use?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach a 70% charge in approximately 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes. The Realme Q5i, with its 33W charging, will likely take over an hour to reach a full charge. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the camera on either of these phones capable of taking good photos in low-light conditions?
Without detailed camera specifications, it's difficult to say definitively. However, given the price range, expect both phones to struggle in very low light. Night mode processing will likely be crucial for improving image quality in these scenarios. Larger sensor sizes and wider apertures generally perform better in low light.
