Realme Q5 vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and efficient performance for everyday tasks, the Realme Q5 emerges as the winner. Its 65W charging significantly outperforms the A53 5G’s 25W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a solid experience. However, the Galaxy A53 5G’s brighter display and potentially more refined camera processing make it a strong contender for multimedia enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Q5 | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 20 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 28 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 48 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Yellow | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | RMX3478 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Q5
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Display brightness likely lower than A53 5G
- Camera specs less defined
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter 830 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Established Samsung brand and software ecosystem
- Slower 25W charging
- Exynos 1280 may be prone to thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 830 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Realme Q5 (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this price bracket). While the A53 5G’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite’ (nominal), this is typical marketing speak; the real-world benefit is a punchy image. The Q5’s display specs are less defined, suggesting a focus on cost reduction in this area. The A53 5G’s larger screen size also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Realme Q5. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise. While both will likely include a standard suite of lenses, the A53 5G’s larger sensor (assuming a typical Samsung implementation) will capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A53 5G is a significant advantage for video recording and sharper photos in challenging conditions. Avoid placing too much weight on the inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on either device; their image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme Q5 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G features the Exynos 1280 (5nm). The Exynos 1280, built on a smaller 5nm process, *should* offer better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance. However, the Snapdragon 695 is a capable performer for everyday tasks and light gaming. The Q5’s CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) is paired against the A53’s (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The A53’s Cortex-A78 cores provide a performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR5 or LPDDR4X will impact responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Q5). However, the Realme Q5’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 48 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s 25W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q5 if you need blazing-fast 65W charging, a responsive processor for daily use, and value efficiency over absolute peak performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption, a more established brand reputation, and a potentially more polished software experience, even if it means slower charging and a slightly less powerful chipset.