Realme Q5 vs GT Neo 3T: Which Realme Phone Delivers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo 3T is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers substantially faster performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Q5 offers respectable 5G connectivity, the GT Neo 3T’s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Q5 | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 20 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 28 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 48 min | 80W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Yellow | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | RMX3478 | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Q5
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity for wider network access
- Respectable battery life
- Significantly slower performance compared to the GT Neo 3T
- Likely a less capable camera system
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Much faster Snapdragon 870 processor
- Faster 80W charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price tag
- Similar battery life to the Q5 despite faster charging
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, compared to the Q5’s unspecified brightness. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (based on market positioning), the GT Neo 3T’s higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The GT Neo 3T’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a standard IPS contrast level, while the Q5’s contrast ratio is not specified. Both devices likely feature a standard 60Hz refresh rate, prioritizing battery life over ultra-smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but details are sparse. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the GT Neo 3T’s higher price point, it likely incorporates a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The Q5, being a budget device, likely utilizes a more basic camera system. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo 3T’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant leap over the Q5’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 architecture with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the 695’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold core. This translates to a substantial performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 870’s Adreno 660 GPU also outperforms the 695’s Adreno 619. While both support 5G, the 870’s processing power allows for faster data speeds and more efficient network handling. The GT Neo 3T is likely paired with faster LPDDR4X RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both the Realme Q5 and GT Neo 3T share an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting similar battery life under moderate usage. However, the GT Neo 3T’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the Q5’s 65W charging. The GT Neo 3T can reach 100% charge in approximately 36 minutes, while the Q5 takes 48 minutes. This faster charging speed is a considerable advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q5 if you prioritize a lower price and 5G connectivity for basic tasks like browsing and social media. It’s a solid option for users on a tight budget who don’t require intensive performance. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you value performance, especially for gaming or content creation. The Snapdragon 870 provides a noticeable upgrade in speed and responsiveness, making it a worthwhile investment for power users.