Realme Q5 Pro vs Realme GT Neo2: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Neo2 edges out the Q5 Pro thanks to its slightly faster charging (65W vs 80W, though the difference is minimal), potentially better display brightness (659 nits measured), and a proven track record of excellent battery life. Both offer fantastic performance, but the GT Neo2 provides a more rounded package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Q5 Pro | Realme GT Neo2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 20 | 2021, September 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 28 | Available. Released 2021, September 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Yellow | Neo Black, Neo Blue, Neo Green |
| Models | RMX3372 | RMX3370 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 980 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 111h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726039 (v9) GeekBench: 3185 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Q5 Pro
- Potentially newer software
- Sleek design
- 80W fast charging
- Less established battery reputation
- Unconfirmed display brightness
- Camera performance details lacking
Realme GT Neo2
- Excellent battery life (111h endurance rating)
- Brighter display (659 nits)
- Proven track record
- 65W fast charging
- Potentially older software
- Design might be less modern
- Contrast ratio claim is nominal
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The GT Neo2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 659 nits, suggesting it performs better in direct sunlight. The Q5 Pro's display is likely very good, but lacks specific brightness measurements. The GT Neo2's 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete information.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a crucial factor. While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the GT Neo2 generally has a slightly better reputation for camera quality, particularly in video recording. The Q5 Pro might have newer software optimizations, but detailed camera comparisons would require in-depth testing. Expect both to offer capable image capture in various conditions.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 870, both devices deliver flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, effortless gaming, and snappy app loading times. There's unlikely to be a significant difference in real-world performance due to the identical chipsets and CPU configurations. Thermal management will be a key differentiator in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The GT Neo2 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 111h is impressive, indicating exceptional battery life. The Q5 Pro's battery capacity is likely similar, but the GT Neo2's optimization and potentially more efficient display contribute to its superior endurance. The GT Neo2 also offers 65W charging, completing a full charge in 36 minutes, while the Q5 Pro boasts 80W charging, potentially reducing charging time slightly.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Realme Q5 Pro? Gamers and users prioritizing a sleek design and potentially a slightly more modern software experience. Who should buy the Realme GT Neo2? Users seeking exceptional battery life, a brighter display, and a device with a well-established reputation for reliability.