The Realme Q3t and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver flagship-level performance without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches – the Q3t with Qualcomm’s efficient Snapdragon 778G, and the F3 GT with MediaTek’s more potent Dimensity 1200. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing balanced performance and efficient charging, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, especially in demanding games, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Realme Q3t remains a strong contender for those seeking a more power-efficient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 10 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 15 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | - | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 600 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 25 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora, Dark Blue | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | - | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Realme Q3t
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Potentially better battery life due to chipset efficiency
- Competitive 30W fast charging
- Lower CPU and GPU performance compared to the Dimensity 1200
- May struggle with demanding games at maximum settings
- Less impressive charging speed than the Poco F3 GT
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Significantly more powerful MediaTek Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Superior gaming performance
- Higher power consumption and potential for thermal throttling
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Q3t
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature similar LCD panels given their price points, the focus here is on performance. Display specs are not provided, so we can only infer. Both are likely 120Hz panels, but the Poco F3 GT’s larger target audience of gamers suggests a potentially more responsive panel. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate switching won’t be as dynamically power-efficient as on flagship models.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, both phones likely employ similar mid-range camera setups. The Poco F3 GT, targeting gamers, may prioritize video recording capabilities. Image processing will likely differ, with Xiaomi’s software often leaning towards more saturated colors, while Realme tends to aim for a more natural look. The absence of information on OIS suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography without significant software intervention.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F3 GT’s MediaTek Dimensity 1200, with its 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and three 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, offers a substantial CPU performance advantage over the Realme Q3t’s Snapdragon 778G (2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime, three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and four 1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores). This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The Dimensity 1200’s Mali-G78 MP16 GPU also outperforms the Snapdragon 778G’s Adreno 642L, making the F3 GT the clear choice for graphically intensive gaming. Both utilize a 6nm process, but the Dimensity 1200’s higher clock speeds and core configuration demand more power, potentially leading to more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Realme Q3t’s 30W charging is respectable, reaching 50% in 25 minutes. However, the Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 42 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 1200’s higher power consumption will likely necessitate a larger battery in the F3 GT to achieve comparable battery life to the Q3t. The faster charging of the F3 GT significantly reduces downtime, a crucial benefit for gamers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q3t if you need a phone that balances performance with excellent battery life and a more manageable thermal profile. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, moderate gaming, and users who value efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and content creation, and are willing to trade some battery life for the significantly faster 67W charging and the more powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and while it’s built on a 6nm process, it does generate more heat than the Snapdragon 778G. The Poco F3 GT likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but extended gaming at maximum settings may lead to some throttling to prevent overheating. Monitoring temperatures during gameplay is recommended.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Snapdragon 778G and Dimensity 1200 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical daily use like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the performance difference will be minimal. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling these tasks smoothly. The Dimensity 1200’s advantage becomes apparent in demanding applications like video editing, heavy multitasking, and graphically intensive games.
❓ Does the Poco F3 GT support high refresh rate gaming?
Given the target audience, it's highly probable the Poco F3 GT supports high refresh rate gaming (90Hz or 120Hz) in compatible titles. However, achieving consistently high frame rates will depend on the game’s optimization and the device’s thermal management capabilities. The Dimensity 1200’s GPU is well-equipped to handle higher frame rates.
