Both the Realme Q3 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT target the competitive mid-range gaming market, leveraging Mediatek’s Dimensity series. However, they approach this segment with different philosophies: the Q3 Pro prioritizes a balanced experience, while the F3 GT aggressively focuses on raw performance and charging speed. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the significantly faster 67W charging is a game-changer. While the Q3 Pro offers a respectable package, the F3 GT’s focus on speed justifies its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 22 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 29 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 100% in 59 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Electric Yellow | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | RMX2205 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Realme Q3 Pro 5G
- Balanced overall experience
- More conservative design
- Competitive price
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Superior performance with Dimensity 1200
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Potentially more aggressive thermal throttling
- Slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display, but both are perfectly adequate for their price point. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits) are missing, both utilize 6nm chipsets which suggests a focus on efficiency. The absence of LTPO technology means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal battery life. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price bracket. Color accuracy will likely vary, with Xiaomi historically leaning towards more saturated colors, while Realme aims for a more natural look.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco F3 GT might prioritize camera performance slightly more. Both phones likely feature a primary sensor around the 64MP mark, but the F3 GT may benefit from a larger sensor size or wider aperture for improved low-light performance. OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a potential differentiator, but its presence on either device is unconfirmed. Image processing styles will differ – Realme often favors brighter, more vibrant images, while Xiaomi tends towards a more realistic approach. The inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on both is largely a marketing tactic and offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200, with its 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and additional 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a clear advantage over the Q3 Pro’s Dimensity 1100 (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher sustained frame rates in demanding games. Both utilize 6nm fabrication, but the 1200’s more powerful core configuration is key. RAM speed (likely LPDDR5) is a factor, but the chipset difference will be more impactful. Thermal management will be crucial; the F3 GT’s more powerful chip will require more robust cooling to avoid throttling.
Battery Life
The Realme Q3 Pro 5G’s 30W charging takes 59 minutes for a full charge, while the Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging completes the same task in just 42 minutes. This 17-minute difference is significant for users who frequently top up their phones. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the F3 GT effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3 support on the F3 GT also adds to its charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q3 Pro 5G if you prioritize a more balanced smartphone experience with a focus on all-around usability and a slightly more conservative design. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you are a dedicated mobile gamer who values maximum performance, incredibly fast charging, and doesn’t mind a more aggressive aesthetic. The F3 GT is built for sustained gaming sessions and quick power-ups.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and sustained gaming will generate heat. Xiaomi likely implemented thermal management solutions (heat pipes, graphite sheets) to mitigate this, but some throttling is possible during extended, graphically intensive games. The F3 GT’s cooling system will be a key factor in maintaining performance.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Realme Q3 Pro 5G slow compared to the competition?
30W charging is respectable, but it’s noticeably slower than the 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT. While it’s not *slow* in absolute terms, users accustomed to faster charging technologies will find the Q3 Pro’s charging speed less convenient.
❓ Does the Poco F3 GT support high frame rates in popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 1200 and the F3 GT’s hardware are capable of supporting high frame rates (60fps or even higher) in PUBG Mobile. However, achieving consistent high frame rates will depend on the game settings and the phone’s thermal management. Expect smooth gameplay at balanced or high graphics settings.
