Realme Q2i vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly brighter display, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765 offers a more robust CPU architecture and a marginally better user experience, despite the Realme Q2i’s competitive pricing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Q2i | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 13. Released 2020, October 21 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | - | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Q2i
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life (114h endurance)
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 765
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 765 processor
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster charging (20W)
- Slightly higher price
- Similar battery life to Realme Q2i
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar contrast ratios at 1269:1, indicating comparable black levels and color depth. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, compared to an unstated value for the Q2i. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Moto G 5G Plus’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, being a slightly higher-tier device, likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor, leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of detail regarding the Realme Q2i’s camera system suggests it may be a less emphasized feature.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G, featuring a Kryo 475 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.3 GHz. This architecture, with its distinct performance tiers (Prime, Gold, Silver), is designed for efficient task allocation. In contrast, the Realme Q2i utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 720, employing a more homogenous octa-core configuration with two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also at 2.0 GHz. While both are 7nm chips, the Snapdragon 765’s CPU architecture generally provides a performance edge in multi-threaded tasks and sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 765 also benefits from a more mature software ecosystem and potentially better GPU performance for gaming.
Battery Life
Both the Realme Q2i and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus supports 20W wired charging, while the Realme Q2i is limited to 18W. This 2W difference, while seemingly small, can translate to a faster 0-100% charge time, offering a convenience advantage to Moto G 5G Plus users. The identical endurance ratings suggest that despite the charging speed difference, both phones are optimized for efficient power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q2i if you need a very affordable 5G phone and are willing to accept slightly less processing power for everyday tasks. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse social media, stream videos, and make calls. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding applications, enjoy occasional gaming, and value a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions.