The Realme Q and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a solid user experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially longer software support, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Realme Q’s 20W, and the newer Snapdragon 695 offers a more efficient 5G experience, despite a slight CPU clock speed difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.18 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | Weather-sealed ports & loudspeaker | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 4035 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Light Green, Light Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CPN-AL00, CPN-W09, CPN-L09 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Q
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed (on paper)
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Established Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 performance
- Slower 20W charging
- Less efficient 10nm chipset
- Potentially shorter software support lifecycle
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695 5G
- Potentially better 5G performance
- Likely better long-term software support
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed (on paper)
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both utilize 60Hz panels. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s display benefits from the newer chipset’s image signal processor, potentially leading to slightly better color reproduction, but without concrete data, this remains speculative.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, Xiaomi generally invests more heavily in camera software and processing, suggesting the Poco X4 Pro 5G may deliver more refined image quality. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both phones likely include one, but these are rarely useful for serious photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Q features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (10nm), while the Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 6nm process node of the 695 offers superior power efficiency compared to the 712’s 10nm, translating to better thermal management and potentially longer battery life during sustained workloads. While the 712 boasts slightly higher peak CPU clock speeds (2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz), the architectural improvements in the Kryo 660 cores of the 695, combined with the process node advantage, likely result in comparable, if not slightly better, real-world performance. Both CPUs share a 2+6 core configuration with similar Kryo Silver core speeds.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the Realme Q’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can reach 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. In contrast, the Realme Q’s 20W charging takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. This charging speed disparity is a significant advantage for the Poco X4 Pro 5G, minimizing downtime and offering a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q if you prioritize a slightly older, but still capable, chipset and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value faster charging, a more modern 5G modem, and potentially better long-term software updates. This is the better option for users who stream videos, play mobile games, or frequently use 5G data.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. Genshin Impact may require lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the older Snapdragon 712.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 20W charging on the Realme Q in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in approximately 22 minutes, while the Realme Q takes 30 minutes to reach just 50%. This means a full charge on the Poco X4 Pro 5G takes around 41 minutes, versus a significantly longer time for the Realme Q. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G significantly better than on the Realme Q?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G features a more modern 5G modem with broader band support and improved efficiency compared to the 5G modem integrated with the Snapdragon 712 in the Realme Q. This translates to potentially faster and more reliable 5G connections, especially in areas with varying 5G network infrastructure.
