The Realme Q and Motorola Moto G9 Power represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they take different approaches. The Realme Q prioritizes processing power with its Snapdragon 712, while the Moto G9 Power emphasizes longevity with its impressive endurance rating. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing smooth multitasking and occasional gaming, the Realme Q emerges as the better choice thanks to its more powerful Snapdragon 712 chipset. However, the Motorola Moto G9 Power’s exceptional battery life and potentially lower price (depending on retailer) make it ideal for those who prioritize extended usage over raw performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe, APEM |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 2), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.18 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 172.1 x 76.8 x 9.7 mm (6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| | Weather-sealed ports & loudspeaker | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, f/2.6, 1/3", AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 590 h (2G) / Up to 790 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 21 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 11 h 40 min (3G) |
| Type | 4035 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Light Green, Light Blue | Electric Violet, Metallic Sage |
| Models | CPN-AL00, CPN-W09, CPN-L09 | XT2091-3, XT2091-4 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.21 W/kg (head) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 149.99 |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 485.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -90.3dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 155h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1680:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 182875 (v8)
GeekBench: 1374 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Q
- More powerful Snapdragon 712 processor
- Faster app loading and multitasking
- Better gaming performance
- Battery life likely inferior to Moto G9 Power
- Display specifications largely unknown
Motorola Moto G9 Power
- Exceptional 155-hour battery life
- Potentially lower price point
- Adequate display brightness (521 nits)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 662 processor
- Slower performance in demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications beyond the Moto G9 Power’s measured 521 nits of peak brightness and 1680:1 contrast ratio. Given the price bracket, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The Moto G9 Power’s measured brightness suggests adequate outdoor visibility, but the Realme Q’s display quality remains largely unknown. The identical contrast ratio indicates similar color reproduction capabilities, though real-world performance will vary. Neither device is expected to compete with higher-end phones featuring OLED technology.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This suggests a focus on basic photography rather than advanced features. Without further information, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera quality. However, the absence of any mention of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device indicates that low-light performance will likely be limited. The 64GB/4GB and 128GB/4GB RAM options for the Moto G9 Power suggest storage might be a more significant consideration for photo/video users.
Performance
The Realme Q’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (10nm) offers a significant performance advantage over the Motorola Moto G9 Power’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 712 features Kryo 360 Gold cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, compared to the 662’s Kryo 260 Gold cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Realme Q. While the 662’s 11nm process *should* theoretically be more efficient, the architectural differences and higher clock speeds of the 712 outweigh this benefit in practical usage. The Realme Q will handle graphically intensive tasks with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G9 Power boasts an impressive endurance rating of 155 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Realme Q’s battery capacity is unspecified, the Moto G9 Power’s longevity is a major selling point. Both devices support 20W wired charging, with the Realme Q claiming a 50% charge in 30 minutes. This suggests comparable charging speeds, but the Moto G9 Power’s larger battery will take longer to fully replenish. The Moto G9 Power’s endurance rating implies it can comfortably last a full day of heavy use, potentially extending to two days with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Q if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding apps and light gaming without significant slowdown. It’s suited for users who frequently switch between applications or enjoy mobile games. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Power if you prioritize battery life above all else, needing a phone that can reliably last through a full day – or even two – on a single charge, and are less concerned with peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 662 in the Moto G9 Power sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the Snapdragon 662 is perfectly capable of handling everyday tasks such as web browsing, social media, and messaging. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it provides a smooth and responsive experience for typical smartphone usage. However, it may struggle with more demanding applications or graphically intensive games.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G9 Power with the 20W charger?
While both phones claim 20W charging, the Moto G9 Power’s larger battery will take longer to fully charge. Expect a full charge to take approximately 2.5 to 3 hours, despite reaching 50% in around 30 minutes. The endurance rating prioritizes longevity over rapid charging.
❓ Will the Realme Q be able to run popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Realme Q, with its Snapdragon 712, should be able to run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, don't expect to max out the graphics settings. The phone may experience some thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ What storage options are available for the Realme Q, and is it expandable?
The context data does not specify the storage options for the Realme Q. However, given its market segment, it likely comes in 64GB or 128GB configurations. Expandability via microSD card is also a possibility, but not confirmed.
