The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme P4 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options. The P4 focuses on raw processing power with the newer Dimensity 7400, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a balanced experience with a focus on battery endurance and display quality. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme P4 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7400 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a performance edge. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a strong contender for those valuing all-day battery life and a brighter display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 20 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 20 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.9 x 7.6 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 3840Hz PWM, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired
10W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Steel Gray, Engine Blue, Forge Red | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme P4
- Faster charging with 80W wired support
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 7400)
- Potential for better sustained performance due to 4nm process
- Battery life details unavailable
- Display brightness information missing
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright display (1073 nits)
- Faster charging than older Motorola models
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7030)
- 6nm process may lead to higher power consumption
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Realme P4 (brightness data unavailable). While the P4’s panel specifics are unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness and likely color accuracy make it superior for multimedia consumption. The Edge 40 Neo’s display technology is likely to be OLED, offering excellent contrast, while the P4’s panel type is unconfirmed. Bezels are expected to be comparable given the market segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond 'Photo/Video' for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo are limited. However, the market positioning suggests a focus on versatile photography. The Realme P4’s camera specifications are also unavailable. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a primary camera capable of good daylight performance, but low-light capabilities will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing algorithms. The absence of details on OIS for either device suggests it may not be a primary feature.
Performance
The Realme P4’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process translates to improved thermal efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load. While both CPUs feature Cortex-A78 cores, the P4 has four, compared to the Neo’s two, alongside a different Cortex-A55 configuration (4x2.0GHz vs 6x2.0GHz). This suggests the P4 will excel in multi-threaded tasks. The 6nm process of the 7030 will likely result in slightly higher power consumption for similar tasks. RAM specifications are not provided, but LPDDR5X support would be a significant benefit for either device.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving 10:28h of active use and an impressive 80-hour endurance rating. While the Realme P4’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging significantly outpaces the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging. The P4 also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Neo. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging can reach 50% in 15 minutes, but the P4’s 80W promises even faster top-ups. The Edge 40 Neo’s longer battery life is a clear advantage for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P4 if you need a phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming or video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Its Dimensity 7400 provides a noticeable performance boost. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant and bright display for media consumption, and a more refined software experience, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7400 in the Realme P4 get noticeably hotter than the Dimensity 7030 during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7400's 4nm process is designed to be more thermally efficient than the 6nm Dimensity 7030. While both chips will generate heat under load, the P4 should exhibit less throttling and maintain higher sustained performance during prolonged gaming, resulting in a cooler overall experience.
❓ How does the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compare to the 80W charging on the Realme P4 in real-world usage?
While the Edge 40 Neo's 68W charging is respectable, reaching 50% in 15 minutes, the Realme P4's 80W charging will likely provide a faster overall charge time from 0-100%. The difference will be most noticeable in the initial stages of charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, the limited camera information is a drawback. It suggests neither phone is aiming to be a camera champion. Expect competent performance in good lighting conditions, but don't anticipate flagship-level image quality, especially in low-light scenarios. Relying on reviews with sample photos will be crucial.
