Realme P4 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range and Flagship Android Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing flagship-level performance and a premium experience, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and superior charging capabilities justify the higher price. However, the Realme P4 Pro offers excellent value for those seeking a solid all-around phone without breaking the bank.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme P4 Pro | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 20 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 27 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), fiber-reinforced plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 76.2 x 7.7 mm | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 4608Hz PWM, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired 10W reverse wired Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Birch Wood, Dark Oak Wood, Midnight Ivy | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | RMX5116 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | ₹ 22,250 | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme P4 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Potentially good value for money
- Less powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset
- Missing display specifications
- Limited camera information
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Incredibly fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Bright and high-quality display
- Significantly higher price
- May be overkill for basic users
- Premium price tag
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1253 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Realme P4 Pro. While the Realme P4 Pro’s display specs are missing, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel. The absence of LTPO information for the Realme P4 Pro implies a potentially less adaptive refresh rate, impacting battery life during static content viewing. Users who frequently consume HDR content or use their phones outdoors will greatly benefit from the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s superior brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information for the Realme P4 Pro is lacking. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s camera is expected to excel in both photo and video capture, leveraging the power of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP. Without specific details on the Realme P4 Pro’s sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s image processing capabilities, powered by the flagship chipset, will likely deliver more refined and detailed images. Users prioritizing camera quality, especially in challenging conditions, will find the Xiaomi 13 Pro a more compelling choice.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi 13 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, while the Realme P4 Pro is equipped with the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture – with its Cortex-X3, A715, and A710 cores – provides a substantial performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. Both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, but the 8 Gen 2’s more advanced architecture and higher clock speeds translate to significantly faster processing. The Realme P4 Pro’s Cortex-720 and Cortex-520 cores, while efficient, are a generation behind and will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Realme P4 Pro’s 80W charging is still fast, but significantly slower. The Xiaomi 13 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Realme P4 Pro. While both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s active use score of 10:55h suggests slightly better real-world battery performance. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s charging ecosystem provides greater flexibility and convenience for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P4 Pro if you need a reliable daily driver with fast charging and don't require the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like heavy gaming or video editing. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prioritize top-tier performance, a stunning display, and incredibly fast charging, and are willing to pay a premium for a flagship experience.