The Realme P4 Pro and Oppo Find X6 Pro represent distinct approaches to the Android smartphone market. The P4 Pro aims to deliver a compelling experience at a more accessible price point, while the Find X6 Pro targets the flagship segment with premium features and top-tier performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X6 Pro is the superior device, offering a significantly more powerful processor and a demonstrably better camera system. However, the Realme P4 Pro provides excellent value, particularly for those prioritizing efficiency and fast charging without the flagship price tag.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 20 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 27 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), fiber-reinforced plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 76.2 x 7.7 mm | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| | - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 4608Hz PWM, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 4.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired
10W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min
50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min
10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Birch Wood, Dark Oak Wood, Midnight Ivy | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | RMX5116 | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | ₹ 22,250 | About 820 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.1 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9)
GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6)
GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme P4 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset
- Less powerful processor than the X6 Pro
- Likely inferior camera performance
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Superior camera system
- Faster 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Potentially less battery efficiency due to higher performance
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Realme P4 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it won’t match the X6 Pro’s peak brightness. The X6 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality OLED panel, likely with excellent black levels. The absence of refresh rate data for the P4 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X6 Pro likely benefits from an adaptive refresh rate (LTPO) for improved power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but the Oppo Find X6 Pro is expected to excel in this area given its flagship positioning. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the X6 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The P4 Pro will likely offer a competent camera experience for casual users, but won’t compete with the X6 Pro’s potential for detailed images and low-light performance. The absence of information regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device makes a definitive comparison impossible, but it’s a feature commonly found on flagship phones like the X6 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme P4 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm), while the Oppo Find X6 Pro is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The 8 Gen 2’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core alongside 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 and 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 performance cores, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores – is a substantial upgrade over the P4 Pro’s 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720, 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720, and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520 configuration. This translates to significantly faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the X6 Pro. The 4nm fabrication process is shared, but the architectural improvements in the 8 Gen 2 provide better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the charging speeds are markedly different. The Oppo Find X6 Pro supports 100W wired charging (0-100% in 30 minutes) and 50W wireless charging (0-100% in 51 minutes), while the Realme P4 Pro offers 80W wired charging and 10W reverse wired charging. The X6 Pro’s faster charging speeds provide a significant convenience advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups. The inclusion of bypass charging on the P4 Pro is a useful feature, allowing charging while the phone is in use, but doesn’t offset the X6 Pro’s overall charging speed advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P4 Pro if you need a reliable daily driver with fast 80W charging and a modern chipset for everyday tasks and light gaming, all while staying within a tighter budget. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prioritize uncompromising performance, exceptional camera capabilities, and faster 100W wired and 50W wireless charging, and are willing to invest in a premium smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 in the Realme P4 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is a capable chipset, but Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. It's suitable for casual gaming, but won't deliver the same performance as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Oppo Find X6 Pro.
❓ How does the 100W charging on the Oppo Find X6 Pro compare to other fast charging solutions?
100W charging is among the fastest currently available, allowing a full charge in approximately 30 minutes. This is significantly faster than standard 25W or 45W charging, and provides a substantial convenience benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the reverse charging feature on both phones useful for charging accessories like earbuds?
Yes, both phones offer reverse charging, allowing you to use them as a power bank for smaller devices like earbuds or smartwatches. However, the Realme P4 Pro's 10W reverse charging is slower than the Oppo Find X6 Pro's, making it less efficient for larger accessories.
❓ Given the similar endurance ratings, will I notice a real-world difference in battery life between the two phones?
While the endurance ratings are identical, the Oppo Find X6 Pro's more powerful processor may consume more power during intensive tasks. However, the X6 Pro's likely larger battery capacity and more efficient display technology could mitigate this difference, resulting in comparable real-world battery life for typical usage.
