The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme P3x and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The P3x focuses on delivering solid performance with the Mediatek Dimensity 6400, while the Edge 50 Fusion aims for a more balanced experience with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and a brighter display. This comparison dives deep into the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is the better choice. Its 68W charging and significantly brighter 1322 nit display outweigh the P3x’s slightly more efficient chipset. However, the P3x remains a strong contender for those prioritizing value and a more conservative power profile.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 18 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 28 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | ArmorShell glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, BLE Audio | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
5W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Stellar Pink, Lunar Silver | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | RMX3944 | XT2429-1 |
| Price | ₹ 12,990 | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
Realme P3x
- Potentially better power efficiency with Dimensity 6400
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Likely more affordable price point
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Inferior display brightness and likely quality
- Slower charging speed (45W)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Significantly brighter 1322 nit display
- Faster 68W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset (International variant)
- Potentially lower battery life due to brighter display and more powerful chipset
- No reverse wireless charging
- LATAM variant uses a less powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significant advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1322 nits. This is substantially higher than what we’d expect from the P3x, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the P3x’s panel specifications are not provided, the Edge 50 Fusion’s brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience. The Edge 50 Fusion’s panel is likely to offer better color vibrancy and contrast, enhancing media consumption and gaming. The lack of information on the P3x’s refresh rate and panel type makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Edge 50 Fusion clearly leads in brightness.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but we can infer some differences. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the Edge 50 Fusion’s focus on a brighter display suggests a greater emphasis on overall image quality. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, Motorola generally employs more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially leading to more detailed and dynamic photos. The P3x likely prioritizes affordability, potentially resulting in a less refined camera experience. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the Edge 50 Fusion is likely to offer more advanced features.
Performance
The chipset is where the core difference lies. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, in its international variant, utilizes the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm). This 4nm process node offers improved power efficiency compared to the 6nm Mediatek Dimensity 6400 in the Realme P3x. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 features a Cortex-A78 based CPU configuration (4x2.40 GHz) which generally provides better single-core performance than the P3x’s Cortex-A76 setup (2x2.5 GHz). However, the P3x has more efficiency cores (6x2.0 GHz vs 4x1.95 GHz), potentially leading to better sustained performance in less demanding tasks. The LATAM variant of the Edge 50 Fusion uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, which would significantly reduce its performance advantage. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s Adreno GPU will also outperform the Mali-G57 MC2 in the P3x, resulting in smoother gaming experiences.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Realme P3x’s 45W charging. While the P3x offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Edge 50 Fusion, the faster charging speed of the Motorola is more impactful for most users. The Edge 50 Fusion also boasts an active use battery score of 12:40h, indicating good battery life despite the brighter display and more powerful chipset. The P3x’s battery capacity is not specified, but the Dimensity 6400’s efficiency may help it achieve comparable battery life, though likely at the expense of performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P3x if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on efficiency and are less concerned with having the brightest display or fastest charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and a stable experience. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prefer a vibrant viewing experience, rapid charging capabilities, and a more modern feature set, even if it means slightly faster battery drain.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Dimensity 6400 in the Realme P3x?
While the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is more powerful, its 4nm process helps mitigate heat generation. However, the P3x’s 6nm Dimensity 6400 is inherently more efficient. Expect the Edge 50 Fusion to potentially get warmer under sustained load, but Motorola’s thermal management should prevent significant throttling. The difference will likely be noticeable, but not debilitating, for most games.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 45W (Realme P3x) and 68W (Motorola Edge 50 Fusion) truly significant in everyday use?
Yes, the 68W charging on the Edge 50 Fusion offers a substantial time saving. Reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes is a significant convenience, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While 45W is still respectable, it will take considerably longer to achieve a similar charge level.
❓ What is the impact of the different Snapdragon chipsets (7s Gen 2 vs 6 Gen 1) on the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion depending on the region?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International) offers a significantly better performance experience than the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (LATAM). The 7s Gen 2 provides a noticeable boost in CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming capabilities. If you are in a region that receives the 6 Gen 1 variant, the performance gap between the Edge 50 Fusion and the Realme P3x narrows considerably.
