The Realme P3 and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The P3 aims to deliver exceptional battery life and efficient performance with its Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the A55 focuses on a premium display experience and Samsung’s established software ecosystem powered by the Exynos 1480. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Realme P3 is the clear winner. Its significantly longer 64:57h battery endurance and faster 45W charging outweigh the Galaxy A55’s brighter display. However, users heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem or demanding a more vibrant viewing experience will find the A55 a worthwhile investment.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 17 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 19 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.7 x 8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520s) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Silver, Comet Grey, Nebula Pink | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | RMX5079 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | £ 260.86 / € 188.00 / ₹ 15,500 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 64:57h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme P3
- Exceptional battery life (64:57h endurance)
- Faster 45W charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 chipset
- Display brightness likely lower than A55
- Camera performance potentially less refined
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter 1010 nit display
- Samsung’s One UI software experience
- Potentially more powerful GPU for gaming
- Significantly shorter battery life (13:27h)
- Slower 25W charging
- Exynos 1480 may be prone to throttling
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1010 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Realme P3 (brightness data unavailable). While the P3’s panel technology isn’t specified, the A55’s likely utilizes Super AMOLED, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A55’s display is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience, particularly for video content. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price segment, but the A55’s higher brightness is a definitive advantage.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but we can infer some differences. The Galaxy A55 likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline, leveraging Samsung’s expertise. While both phones likely include a primary camera, the A55’s sensor size and aperture are expected to be larger, resulting in better low-light performance. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55 is probable, further enhancing image clarity. The Realme P3 may rely more on software algorithms to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The Realme P3’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4nm) utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with a prime Cortex-A720s core clocked at 2.3 GHz, suggesting a focus on efficiency. The Samsung Galaxy A55, however, employs the Exynos 1480 (4nm) with four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.75 GHz, prioritizing raw processing power. While the A55’s CPU cores have a higher clock speed, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4’s newer architecture and 4nm process could offer comparable real-world performance with better thermal management. The A55’s GPU is likely to be more powerful, benefiting graphically intensive tasks like gaming, but the P3’s efficiency may lead to less throttling during extended sessions. Both devices likely feature similar RAM configurations, but the P3’s optimized chipset could provide a smoother experience for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Realme P3 truly shines. Its impressive 64:57h endurance rating significantly surpasses the Galaxy A55’s 13:27h active use score. This translates to potentially two full days of use on a single charge for the P3, compared to a day and a half for the A55. The P3’s 45W wired charging is also considerably faster than the A55’s 25W, allowing for a 50% charge in just 30 minutes. While the A55’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the P3’s superior endurance and charging speed make it the clear winner in this category. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 4’s efficiency plays a crucial role in maximizing battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P3 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use and prioritize fast charging. This phone is ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a brighter, more visually appealing display, value Samsung’s One UI software experience, and are willing to trade some battery life for those features. It’s a strong choice for media consumption and everyday productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1480 is a capable chip, it's known to generate more heat than some of its competitors, particularly during sustained, demanding tasks like gaming. This can lead to thermal throttling, reducing performance over time. The Realme P3’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, with its more efficient 4nm process, is less likely to suffer from significant throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Realme P3 compared to the 25W charging on the Galaxy A55 in real-world use?
The Realme P3’s 45W charging can deliver a 50% charge in approximately 30 minutes, while the Galaxy A55’s 25W charging will take considerably longer – likely closer to an hour or more. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the difference in battery endurance between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The Realme P3’s 64:57h endurance rating translates to a tangible difference in daily use. Users can expect to comfortably get through a full day of heavy use, and potentially two days of moderate use, without needing to recharge. The Galaxy A55, with its 13:27h score, will likely require daily charging for most users.
