The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme P3 and Oppo F25 Pro are two contenders vying for your attention. The P3 leverages Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, built on a 4nm process, while the F25 Pro opts for MediaTek’s Dimensity 7050, fabricated on a 6nm node. This comparison will dissect their key differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and charging capabilities to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term battery health and efficient performance, the Realme P3 emerges as the winner. Its 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 chipset promises superior power efficiency and a remarkable 1400 charge cycles, offsetting the slightly slower charging speed compared to the Oppo F25 Pro.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 17 | 2024, February 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 19 | Available. Released 2024, March 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.7 x 8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520s) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD2.0, QC3, 100% in 48 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Silver, Comet Grey, Nebula Pink | Ocean Blue, Lava Red |
| Models | RMX5079 | - |
| Price | £ 260.86 / € 188.00 / ₹ 15,500 | ₹ 22,799 |
| SAR | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 64:57h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Realme P3
- Exceptional battery life (64:57h endurance)
- Long-lasting battery health (1400 charge cycles)
- Power-efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4nm)
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Lacks reverse wired charging
Oppo F25 Pro
- Faster charging (67W, 100% in 48 min)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially smoother display experience (speculative)
- Less power-efficient chipset (6nm)
- Potentially shorter battery lifespan
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the price points, both devices likely feature AMOLED panels. However, the chipset choice hints at potential differences in display capabilities. The Dimensity 7050 typically supports higher refresh rates and more advanced display features. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume the Oppo F25 Pro may offer a slightly more vibrant or smoother visual experience, but this remains speculative.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are missing, but given the market segment, both phones likely feature multi-camera systems. The absence of information prevents a detailed comparison. However, Oppo generally emphasizes image processing and software enhancements, potentially giving the F25 Pro an edge in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Realme tends to focus on delivering competitive specs at a lower price point, so the P3 might prioritize sensor size over advanced software features.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme P3’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4nm) utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with a prime Cortex-A720s core clocked at 2.3 GHz, supported by three Cortex-A720s at 2.2 GHz and four Cortex-A520s at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the Oppo F25 Pro’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm) featuring a dual-core Cortex-A78 setup at 2.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. While the Dimensity 7050 boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4’s 4nm process provides a significant advantage in power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon's architecture suggests a focus on balanced performance, while the Dimensity prioritizes peak speeds.
Battery Life
The Realme P3 boasts a remarkable 64:57h endurance rating and a 1400-cycle battery lifespan, indicating exceptional battery life and longevity. While the Oppo F25 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 67W charging with PD2.0 and QC3 support allows for a full charge in just 48 minutes – significantly faster than the P3’s 45W charging (50% in 30 minutes). The F25 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the P3. However, the P3’s superior endurance and extended battery lifespan are compelling advantages for users who prioritize long-term reliability and minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P3 if you need exceptional battery endurance, prioritize long-term battery health with its 1400 cycle rating, and value efficient performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Oppo F25 Pro if you prefer faster charging speeds – reaching 100% in just 48 minutes – and benefit from reverse wired charging, making it a convenient power bank for other devices. The F25 Pro is geared towards users who frequently top up their phones and need that added charging flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 in the Realme P3 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While not a flagship chipset, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 is a capable performer. Genshin Impact will likely be playable at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 4nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, allowing for more sustained performance compared to older 6nm chips. However, don't expect the same level of performance as phones with Snapdragon 8 series or Dimensity 9000 series processors.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo F25 Pro compared to the 45W charging on the Realme P3 in real-world use?
The Oppo F25 Pro's 67W charging will significantly reduce charging times. While the P3 reaches 50% in 30 minutes, the F25 Pro can achieve a full charge in 48 minutes. This means a quick top-up during a short break is much more feasible with the F25 Pro. However, the P3's longer battery life may mean you won't need to charge as frequently.
❓ Does the Dimensity 7050 in the Oppo F25 Pro get noticeably hotter than the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 during prolonged gaming sessions?
The 6nm Dimensity 7050 is likely to generate more heat than the 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 under sustained load. The Snapdragon's smaller process node contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially resulting in less throttling and more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions. However, Oppo's thermal management system will play a crucial role in mitigating any overheating issues.
