The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme P2 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking premium features without the flagship price tag. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on performance, battery life, and charging speed to determine which device offers the most well-rounded experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging and 1283 nits peak brightness provide a tangible advantage. However, the Realme P2 Pro remains a strong contender, particularly for those valuing a slightly different chipset architecture.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 13 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 17 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 19 min, 100% in 49 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Parrot Green, Eagle Grey | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | - | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme P2 Pro
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers efficient performance.
- 4nm process ensures good thermal management.
- Potentially optimized GPU for gaming.
- Slower 80W charging compared to the Redmi.
- Display brightness likely lower than the Redmi.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- 120W charging provides incredibly fast top-ups.
- 1283 nits peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Long 10:38h active use battery life.
- Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra may not be as optimized for gaming as the Snapdragon.
- Potential for more software bloat (typical of Xiaomi).
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor use, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Realme P2 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, the Redmi’s brightness level suggests a clear win in this category. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, common in this price range, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests standard refresh rate management, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Realme P2 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a high-resolution main sensor (likely 200MP, based on market trends for this model), potentially with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The larger sensor size and OIS would provide superior low-light performance and image stabilization. The Realme P2 Pro’s camera performance will likely rely heavily on software processing to compensate for any hardware limitations. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering minimal practical benefit to most users.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme P2 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, also on a 4nm node. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra employs a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 cores, compared to the Snapdragon’s 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This suggests the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will exhibit stronger multi-core performance. However, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is known for its optimized GPU, potentially offering a more consistent gaming experience. Both devices benefit from the efficiency of the 4nm process, minimizing thermal throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines in battery and charging. It achieves an impressive 10:38h active use score, indicating excellent battery life. Crucially, it supports 120W wired charging, reaching 100% charge in just 19 minutes. The Realme P2 Pro, with its 80W charging, takes 49 minutes to fully charge. While the P2 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ significantly reduces downtime, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P2 Pro if you prioritize a Qualcomm chipset known for its efficient power management and strong gaming performance, and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging speed. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible charging, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a longer active use battery life, even if it means opting for a Mediatek processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is a powerful chip, thermal throttling is always a possibility during extended gaming. However, the 4nm process node helps mitigate this, and Xiaomi typically employs effective cooling solutions in their devices. Real-world performance will depend on the specific game and ambient temperature, but it's unlikely to be a major issue for most users.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Realme P2 Pro compare to typical fast charging standards?
80W charging is still considered fast, and will significantly reduce charging times compared to standard 18W or 25W chargers. While slower than the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 120W, it's still capable of charging the device to 50% in approximately 19 minutes, and fully charging in under an hour. It's a perfectly acceptable charging speed for most users.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 vs Cortex-A715) noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference between the Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A715 cores will be minimal. Both are efficient and capable cores. The Cortex-A715 in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a performance advantage in more demanding, multi-threaded applications and benchmarks.
