The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme P2 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options. The P2 Pro focuses on rapid charging and a newer chipset, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes all-day battery life and a bright display. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the Realme P2 Pro is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a performance edge, and the 80W charging is significantly faster. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in battery endurance, making it ideal for users who need a phone that lasts a full day and beyond.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 13 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 17 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 19 min, 100% in 49 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Parrot Green, Eagle Grey | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme P2 Pro
- Faster charging with 80W support
- Potentially better performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- More efficient 4nm chipset
- Battery life likely shorter than Edge 40 Neo
- Camera specs currently unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright display (1073 nits)
- Faster 50% charge time than many competitors
- Chipset may throttle under sustained load
- Performance slightly behind Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While the Realme P2 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage is a clear win. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel technology is likely OLED, offering excellent contrast and color accuracy, though this is not explicitly stated. Bezels are expected to be similar on both devices, given their market positioning.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo / Video' are unavailable for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. However, given Motorola’s recent focus, it likely features a capable main sensor with OIS. The Realme P2 Pro’s camera details are also missing, making a direct comparison difficult. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s impossible to determine which phone will perform better in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the quality will depend heavily on image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Realme P2 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) offers a potential performance advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The smaller 4nm process node generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The P2 Pro’s CPU configuration (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) features slightly faster prime cores compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), suggesting a slight edge in single-core performance. However, the Dimensity 7030’s six efficiency cores could offer better multi-core efficiency.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This suggests a larger battery capacity and optimized power management. The Realme P2 Pro compensates with its 80W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes and 100% in 49 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging is still fast, hitting 50% in 15 minutes, but the P2 Pro’s charging speed is noticeably quicker. This trade-off – longer battery life versus faster charging – is a key differentiator.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme P2 Pro if you need a phone that can quickly top up its battery and handle demanding tasks with ease. It’s ideal for gamers and power users who value performance. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a bright and vibrant display, and a more balanced overall experience. It’s perfect for everyday users who don’t want to worry about constantly charging their phone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chipset, its 6nm process node may lead to more heat generation compared to the Realme P2 Pro’s 4nm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. Expect some throttling during extended gaming, but the Edge 40 Neo likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate this.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Realme P2 Pro impact long-term battery health compared to the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo?
Faster charging speeds *can* contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over the long term, but modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging algorithms to minimize this effect. The difference between 80W and 68W is unlikely to be significant in real-world usage, and both phones should maintain acceptable battery health for several years.
❓ Is the difference in CPU core configurations (4x2.40GHz vs 2x2.5GHz) noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical daily use like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference in CPU core configurations is unlikely to be noticeable. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s advantage will be more apparent in demanding applications like video editing or graphically intensive games.
