The Realme Note 70T and vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Note 70T focuses on providing a functional experience at an extremely competitive price point, while the iQOO Neo 7 Pro aims for near-flagship performance with a focus on gaming and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their core differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power and gaming capabilities compared to the Realme Note 70T’s Unisoc T7250. While the Note 70T offers excellent value, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s 120W charging and superior chipset justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 23 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 76.6 x 7.9 mm (6.58 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 197 g or 202 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
13 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Fearless Flame, Dark Storm |
| Models | RMX5313 | I2217 |
| Price | € 71.00 / $ 86.99 / £ 69.99 | About 380 EUR |
Realme Note 70T
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Functional and reliable
- Slow charging speed (15W)
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the iQOO Neo 7 Pro
vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Superior gaming capabilities
- Higher price compared to the Realme Note 70T
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
Display Comparison
While display specifications are absent in the provided data, it's reasonable to assume both devices utilize LCD panels given their price segments. However, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, being positioned higher, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling and gaming. The Realme Note 70T will likely prioritize cost-effectiveness over display quality, resulting in a more basic viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, as a higher-tier device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Realme Note 70T will likely feature a more basic camera setup focused on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. Image processing capabilities will also likely favor the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores. This architecture delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Realme Note 70T’s Unisoc T7250 (12nm). The Unisoc T7250, with its Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, is geared towards efficiency and basic tasks. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. Users who play graphically intensive games or engage in video editing will overwhelmingly benefit from the iQOO Neo 7 Pro.
Battery Life
The Realme Note 70T’s 15W wired charging is considerably slower than the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 8 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly top up their phone will greatly appreciate the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s charging speed. The Note 70T will require significantly longer to fully charge, making it less convenient for users with demanding schedules.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Note 70T if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption, and are willing to compromise on raw performance. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and incredibly fast charging, and are willing to invest in a more powerful device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T7250 in the Realme Note 70T struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Unisoc T7250 is not designed for graphically intensive games. While it can handle less demanding titles, you'll likely experience significant frame drops and lag in games like Genshin Impact, even on lower settings. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is far better equipped for such games.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo 7 Pro compared to the 15W charging on the Realme Note 70T in a real-world scenario?
The difference is substantial. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro can charge from 0% to 50% in approximately 8 minutes. The Realme Note 70T will take well over an hour to achieve the same level of charge. This makes the iQOO Neo 7 Pro ideal for users who need a quick power boost before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the iQOO Neo 7 Pro tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. However, the 4nm fabrication process and iQOO’s cooling solutions (likely including vapor chamber cooling) are designed to mitigate thermal throttling, providing a more consistent gaming experience compared to older generation chips.
