Realme Note 70T vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software support, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chip and exceptional image processing capabilities justify the price premium. However, the Realme Note 70T offers compelling value for those on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Note 70T | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 23 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 76.6 x 7.9 mm (6.58 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | RMX5313 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | € 71.00 / $ 86.99 / £ 69.99 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Realme Note 70T
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent battery life due to efficient chipset
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to Pixel 7a
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited software update support
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera quality with Google’s image processing
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 processor
- Guaranteed software updates and features
- Higher price compared to Realme Note 70T
- Charging speed is moderate (18W)
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an assumed lower brightness on the Realme Note 70T (typical of its price segment). While the Note 70T’s panel specifications are not provided, the Pixel 7a’s brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (implied by its flagship lineage) also provides a smoother scrolling experience than the likely 60Hz panel on the Note 70T. Bezels are expected to be tighter on the Pixel 7a, contributing to a more premium feel.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in low-light photography and offers features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The Realme Note 70T, while likely offering a decent camera for its price, cannot compete with the Pixel 7a’s image processing capabilities. The absence of OIS on the Note 70T will also result in less stable videos. We can assume the Note 70T will rely heavily on software enhancements to compensate for hardware limitations.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores and 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, alongside 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts sharply with the Realme Note 70T’s Unisoc T7250 (12nm), which utilizes 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Tensor G2’s more advanced architecture and smaller fabrication node translate to significantly faster processing speeds and improved power efficiency, making the Pixel 7a the better choice for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Pixel 7a also benefits from faster RAM (likely LPDDR5x) compared to the Note 70T.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a achieved an Endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating strong battery life despite its powerful processor. While the Realme Note 70T’s battery capacity is unknown, its less demanding Unisoc T7250 chipset and 15W charging suggest a focus on longevity over rapid charging. The Pixel 7a offers 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, providing greater flexibility. The faster charging speed of the Pixel 7a, combined with its efficient processor, means less downtime and more usage time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Note 70T if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and aren't concerned with high-end gaming or photography. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a superior camera experience, smooth performance with Google’s Tensor G2, and guaranteed software updates for years to come, even if it means spending more.