Realme Neo7 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the Realme Neo7 is the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset offers a significant performance leap. However, the Poco F5 Pro provides a more refined experience with its excellent battery endurance, faster charging speeds, and proven thermal management.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Neo7 | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 11 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 11 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.6 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, White |
| Models | RMX5060 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Neo7
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9300+ chipset for superior performance
- 80W wired charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially more future-proof due to newer architecture
- Lack of wireless charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Excellent 99-hour battery endurance
- 67W wired and 30W wireless charging options
- Proven thermal management of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Older chipset compared to the Dimensity 9300+
- Peak performance may be lower than the Neo7
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Neo7, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Poco F5 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates deep blacks. Without specific refresh rate or resolution details for the Neo7, the Poco F5 Pro appears to have a slight edge in display quality based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to expect the Poco F5 Pro to prioritize image processing for a balanced, consumer-friendly look, while the Neo7 might lean towards a more vibrant, potentially less natural, aesthetic. The absence of details suggests neither phone will be a standout camera performer.
Performance
The Realme Neo7’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) is architecturally more advanced than the Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Neo7’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – suggests a focus on peak performance, particularly with the multiple high-clocked X4 cores. The Poco F5 Pro’s 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 is a proven performer, but the Neo7’s newer architecture should translate to gains in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its thermal efficiency, potentially leading to more sustained performance under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro’s endurance rating of 99 hours, coupled with its 67W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes), 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes), and PD3.0/QC3+ support, provides a significant advantage in charging versatility and speed. The Realme Neo7’s 80W wired charging is faster on paper, but lacks wireless charging options. The Poco F5 Pro’s 99-hour endurance rating suggests a larger battery capacity and/or more efficient power management, offering a more reliable all-day experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Neo7 if you demand the absolute fastest CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing, high-end gaming, or running complex applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, fast charging convenience (including wireless), and a consistently smooth experience without worrying about thermal throttling during extended use.