Realme Neo7 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and demanding tasks like gaming, the Realme Neo7 is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 9300+ chipset. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in battery life and offers a more refined, all-day experience for typical users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Neo7 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 11 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 11 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.6 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMX5060 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme Neo7
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Battery life is unknown and potentially lower than the Edge 40 Neo
- Display specifications are currently unavailable
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use, 80h endurance)
- Bright display (1073 nits)
- Fast 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- 6nm process may lead to more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a display capable of reaching 1073 nits of peak brightness, a measured value that suggests excellent outdoor visibility. While the Realme Neo7’s display specifications are currently unavailable, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness level is a strong indicator of its usability in bright conditions. Without knowing the panel technology (OLED vs LCD) or refresh rate of the Neo7, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy and smoothness. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness provides a clear advantage for outdoor viewing.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Realme Neo7’s camera is limited. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera is described as offering both Photo and Video capabilities, but lacks specific sensor details. Without knowing the main sensor resolution, aperture, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s camera is likely optimized for balanced image quality in various lighting conditions. We can assume the Neo7, given its focus on overall specs, will also offer a competitive camera system, but its strengths remain unknown without further information.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Realme Neo7’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) features a unique core configuration – 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – designed for peak performance. This contrasts sharply with the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the Neo7’s chipset offers superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm node of the Edge 40 Neo, meaning the Neo7 is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Cortex-X4 cores in the Neo7 represent a significant architectural upgrade over the Cortex-A78 cores in the Edge 40 Neo, translating to faster single-core and multi-core performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This suggests a well-optimized software and efficient chipset. The Realme Neo7’s battery capacity is unknown, but it compensates with 80W wired charging. The Edge 40 Neo offers 68W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes. While the Neo7’s charging is faster overall, the Edge 40 Neo’s longer battery life may negate the need for frequent top-ups for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Neo7 if you need uncompromising processing power for gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications. Its Dimensity 9300+ offers a substantial performance leap. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a comfortable user experience, and a more balanced feature set, making it ideal for everyday use and media consumption.