Realme Neo7 Turbo vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme Neo7 Turbo emerges as the winner. Its newer Dimensity 9400e chipset offers a performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads, and the 100W charging is significantly faster than the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W. While the 12 Pro retains a premium build, the Neo7 Turbo’s value proposition is stronger.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Neo7 Turbo | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 29 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.09" | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, PPS, UFCS, 50% in 18 min, 100% in 47 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Gray, Blue |
| Models | - | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 570 EUR |
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- Faster 100W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Newer Dimensity 9400e chipset offers improved performance.
- Potentially better value for money.
- Build quality may not match the Xiaomi 12 Pro.
- Camera system likely less sophisticated than the 12 Pro.
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Premium build quality and materials.
- Likely superior display with LTPO technology.
- Potentially better camera performance in challenging conditions.
- Slower 67W charging.
- Older Dimensity 9000+ chipset.
- Higher price point.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Neo7 Turbo’s positioning, it likely features a high-refresh-rate AMOLED panel, potentially 120Hz, but likely lacks LTPO technology found in flagship Xiaomi devices. The Xiaomi 12 Pro, being a former flagship, almost certainly boasts an LTPO AMOLED display with adaptive refresh rates, offering superior power efficiency. While the Neo7 Turbo may offer comparable color accuracy, the 12 Pro’s LTPO panel provides a smoother, more efficient viewing experience, especially during static content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Xiaomi 12 Pro, as a former flagship, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Neo7 Turbo, while potentially offering a capable camera system, will likely prioritize value over outright image quality. Expect the 12 Pro to excel in low-light photography and dynamic range, while the Neo7 Turbo may offer a more vibrant, social media-friendly look. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant for serious photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Neo7 Turbo’s Dimensity 9400e (4nm) utilizes a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4GHz, alongside three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85GHz, and four Cortex-A720 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core at 3.2GHz, three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.85GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. The Neo7 Turbo’s newer architecture, particularly the X4 cores, should translate to improved single-core and multi-core performance, and potentially better power efficiency. The 9400e’s architecture is a generation ahead, offering gains in IPC. However, the 12 Pro’s larger cache and optimized software could mitigate some of the difference. Both phones utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Neo7 Turbo’s newer chipset may benefit more from the faster memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Realme Neo7 Turbo’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a 50% charge in just 18 minutes and a full charge in 47 minutes. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W charging, while still fast, pales in comparison. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Neo7 Turbo effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size. The inclusion of PD, PPS, and UFCS protocols on the Neo7 Turbo also offers broader compatibility with various chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Neo7 Turbo if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding apps, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who frequently push their phone to its limits. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you prefer a more refined, flagship-level build quality and a slightly more mature software experience, and aren’t as concerned about having the absolute latest chipset or fastest charging.