Realme Neo7 Turbo vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9400e offers a significant leap in CPU and GPU power, coupled with 100W charging. However, the Pixel 6 Pro remains a strong contender for those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem and prioritizing computational photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Neo7 Turbo | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 29 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1800 nits (HBM), 6500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.09" | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, PPS, UFCS, 50% in 18 min, 100% in 47 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7200 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- Significantly faster charging (100W)
- More powerful CPU (Dimensity 9400e)
- Likely higher gaming performance
- Camera performance likely inferior to Pixel 6 Pro
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera with Google’s computational photography
- Refined software experience with exclusive Google features
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Significantly slower charging (23W)
- Older chipset (Google Tensor) with less raw power
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Neo7 Turbo’s display specs are currently unavailable, Realme typically prioritizes high refresh rates in this series. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size (6.7 inches vs. likely 6.67 inches on the Neo7 Turbo) may appeal to media consumers, but the Neo7 Turbo could potentially offer a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s Tensor chip for features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone. While the Neo7 Turbo’s camera specs are currently unknown, Realme often focuses on high megapixel counts. However, image quality isn’t solely determined by megapixels; the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing pipeline and sensor size (likely larger than the Neo7 Turbo’s) will likely deliver more consistent and detailed results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 6 Pro’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) will also contribute to sharper photos and smoother videos.
Performance
The Realme Neo7 Turbo’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, fabricated on a 4nm process, represents a significant architectural shift. Its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4GHz, alongside three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85GHz, suggests a focus on sustained peak performance. This contrasts with the Pixel 6 Pro’s Google Tensor (5nm), which utilizes a 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 and 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 configuration. While Tensor excels in AI tasks, the Neo7 Turbo’s newer CPU architecture and higher clock speeds should translate to superior performance in CPU-intensive benchmarks and gaming. The Neo7 Turbo’s likely LPDDR5X RAM will further enhance memory bandwidth, contributing to a snappier overall experience.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (Pixel 6 Pro’s capacity is unknown). However, the Realme Neo7 Turbo’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer. Reaching 50% charge in just 18 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes significantly reduces downtime. The Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0, is considerably slower. The Pixel 6 Pro does offer 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Neo7 Turbo, providing added convenience for compatible devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Neo7 Turbo if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. It's ideal for power users and those who frequently multitask. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a refined software experience with exclusive Google features, a focus on computational photography, and a more established brand reputation, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.