The Realme Neo7 SE and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Neo7 SE prioritizes raw processing power with its cutting-edge Dimensity 8400 Max chipset, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ focuses on a well-rounded experience with a faster full-charge time and established brand recognition. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance, especially gaming and demanding applications, the Realme Neo7 SE is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8400 Max offers a substantial leap in processing power over the Redmi Note 11 Pro+'s Snapdragon 695. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ offers a slightly more complete charging solution.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 25 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 25 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.3 x 8.6 mm (6.40 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Max (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE (planned upgrade to 6.0) | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 23 min to 50% | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Black | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | - | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Realme Neo7 SE
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- More efficient 4nm chipset for better thermal management
- Faster initial charging speed (0-50%)
- Full charge time is slower than the Redmi Note 11 Pro+
- Camera specifications are unknown, potential for lower quality
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster full charge time (0-100%)
- Potentially better camera system based on Xiaomi's track record
- Established brand and ecosystem
- Significantly slower processor compared to the Realme Neo7 SE
- Less efficient 6nm chipset, potential for more throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Neo7 SE's focus on performance, it's likely to feature a high refresh rate panel. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, common for Xiaomi's mid-range offerings. Color accuracy and peak brightness will be key differentiators, but without data, we can only speculate. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, so analysis relies on brand tendencies. Xiaomi typically emphasizes camera capabilities in its 'Note' series, potentially giving the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ an edge in image processing and feature set. However, the Neo7 SE's superior processing power could allow for more advanced computational photography algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive judgment is impossible. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on the individual sensors used.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Neo7 SE's Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Max (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8400 Max boasts a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A725 cores clocked up to 3.25 GHz – compared to the Snapdragon 695's Kryo 660 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8400 Max also translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Neo7 SE will deliver a smoother and more responsive experience, particularly in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G advertises a 0-100% charge in 42 minutes with its 67W charging, while the Realme Neo7 SE claims 50% charge in 23 minutes with 80W charging. While the Neo7 SE charges faster initially, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ completes a full charge quicker. Battery capacity is unknown for both devices, but the faster charging speed of the Neo7 SE, even if it doesn't reach 100% as quickly, provides more convenient top-ups throughout the day. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 *could* offer slightly better battery life under light usage, but the Dimensity 8400 Max's efficiency gains will likely offset this in most real-world scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Neo7 SE if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing. Its Dimensity 8400 Max will handle demanding tasks with ease. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on quick top-ups and a more established ecosystem, and your usage is primarily focused on everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to maintain consistent frame rates in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact, even on medium settings. The Realme Neo7 SE's Dimensity 8400 Max is far better equipped to handle such titles.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the 4nm vs 6nm process node make in terms of battery life?
The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8400 Max is more efficient, meaning it consumes less power for the same level of performance. While the difference might not be dramatic in everyday use, it will be noticeable during prolonged gaming sessions or when running demanding applications, resulting in better sustained performance and potentially longer battery life.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the Realme Neo7 SE likely to degrade the battery faster than the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+?
While faster charging *can* contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over the long term, modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging management systems to mitigate this effect. The difference in degradation between 67W and 80W is likely to be minimal and outweighed by the convenience of faster charging.
