Realme Neo7 SE vs OnePlus Nord 2T: Which Dimensity Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Realme Neo7 SE emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8400 Max chipset offers a significant architectural advantage over the Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300. While both share 80W charging and similar battery endurance ratings, the Neo7 SE’s superior processing power justifies its position as the better value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Realme Neo7 SE | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 25 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 25 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.3 x 8.6 mm (6.40 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Max (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE (planned upgrade to 6.0) | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 23 min to 50% | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Black | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Neo7 SE
- Superior chipset performance with Dimensity 8400 Max
- More efficient 4nm manufacturing process
- Faster charging speed (50% in 23 minutes)
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Brighter display (636 nits)
- Refined software experience from OnePlus
- PD support for wider charger compatibility
- Older Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Less efficient 6nm manufacturing process
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T features a display capable of reaching 636 nits of peak brightness, providing good visibility outdoors. While the Realme Neo7 SE’s display specs are not provided, the Nord 2T’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical AMOLED panel. The brightness difference is a key advantage for the Nord 2T in direct sunlight. However, without knowing the Neo7 SE’s panel technology or refresh rate, a definitive display winner is difficult to declare. The Nord 2T’s brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Nord 2T may lean towards a more polished, software-driven camera experience, typical of OnePlus. The Neo7 SE, being a more value-focused device, might prioritize hardware specifications. The absence of details makes it difficult to assess which device captures superior images or videos. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro lenses on both devices, the main sensor performance will be the deciding factor.
Performance
This is where the Realme Neo7 SE pulls ahead significantly. The Dimensity 8400 Max (4nm) utilizes a more efficient manufacturing process than the Nord 2T’s Dimensity 1300 (6nm). The Neo7 SE’s CPU configuration – 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725, and 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 – represents a newer generation of ARM cores compared to the Nord 2T’s 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. The 4nm process also implies better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will see a noticeable difference.
Battery Life
Both the Realme Neo7 SE and OnePlus Nord 2T boast an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. Crucially, both support 80W wired charging, with the Neo7 SE claiming a 50% charge in 23 minutes. The Nord 2T also supports PD (Power Delivery), offering broader compatibility with chargers. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the fast charging speeds mitigate concerns about smaller battery sizes. The 80W charging is a significant advantage for both, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Neo7 SE if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the benefits of a more modern chipset architecture. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prioritize a refined software experience, a slightly brighter display (636 nits), and are comfortable with a slightly older, but still capable, processor. The Nord 2T also benefits from OnePlus’s established ecosystem and support.