The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo N63 and Xiaomi Poco C65 are two contenders vying for your attention. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Narzo N63 prioritizes fast charging, while the Poco C65 focuses on maximizing battery endurance and offering a brighter display.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a more visible screen in bright conditions, the Xiaomi Poco C65 is the better choice. Its Helio G85 chipset, coupled with its impressive 11:31h active use battery score, provides a more consistently reliable experience. However, the Narzo N63’s 45W charging is a significant advantage for those who value quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 06 | 2023, November 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 10 | Available. Released 2023, November 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.7 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) | 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm (6.61 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g or 191 g (6.67 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 18W wired, PD |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Leather Blue, Twilight Purple | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Models | - | 2310FPCA4G, 2310FPCA4I |
| Price | About 90 EUR | € 99.95 / $ 139.99 / £ 115.99 / ₹ 8,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo N63
- 45W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Unisoc chipset may offer unique power efficiency characteristics
- Unisoc chipset has less established software support
- Battery life likely shorter than Poco C65
- Display specifications are unknown and potentially inferior
Xiaomi Poco C65
- Excellent battery life (11:31h active use)
- Brighter display (607 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Helio G85 offers slightly better performance
- Slower 18W charging
- May be slightly more expensive than Narzo N63
- Potential for bloatware from Xiaomi
Display Comparison
The Poco C65 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 607 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Narzo N63. This makes the Poco C65 more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. Furthermore, the Poco C65’s 1555:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While both likely utilize LCD panels given the price point, the Poco C65’s superior brightness and contrast provide a noticeably better viewing experience. The Narzo N63’s display specifications are currently unknown, making a definitive comparison difficult, but it’s unlikely to match the Poco C65’s performance in this area.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited information. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors, but the sensor sizes and apertures are unknown. The Poco C65’s inclusion of photo and video capabilities suggests a more versatile camera system, but without specific details, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on budget phones suggests both devices may include one, but these are generally of limited practical use. The image processing algorithms employed by Xiaomi and Realme will significantly impact the final image quality, and this is an area where user reviews will be crucial.
Performance
Both phones utilize 12nm process technology, but the Poco C65’s MediaTek Helio G85 has a slight edge in CPU clock speed (2.0 GHz vs 1.8 GHz on the Narzo N63’s Unisoc Tiger T612). Both chipsets feature the same core configuration – 2x Cortex-A75 and 6x Cortex-A55 – but the higher clock speed on the Helio G85 translates to marginally faster processing in benchmarks and real-world tasks. While neither chipset is a powerhouse, the Helio G85 is generally considered more capable for light gaming. The Narzo N63’s Unisoc chipset is less common, potentially leading to less optimized software support. RAM configurations are not specified, but the chipset choice suggests the Poco C65 will offer a smoother experience for multitasking.
Battery Life
The Poco C65 shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 11:31h active use score. While the Narzo N63’s battery capacity is unspecified, its 45W wired charging is a significant advantage. The Poco C65 supports 18W charging with Power Delivery (PD), which is slower. This means the Narzo N63 can replenish its battery much faster, even if the battery capacity is slightly smaller. The trade-off is clear: the Poco C65 offers longer runtimes, while the Narzo N63 prioritizes charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo N63 if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly recharge your phone and don't mind potentially shorter battery life. This phone suits users who prioritize convenience and fast power delivery. Buy the Xiaomi Poco C65 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of moderate to heavy use, and appreciate a brighter, more visible display for outdoor use. This is the better option for users who value longevity and screen clarity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the Narzo N63 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc Tiger T612 is an entry-level chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. The Helio G85 in the Poco C65 offers a slight performance advantage and may handle PUBG Mobile at slightly higher settings.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Poco C65 with the 18W charger?
While 18W charging isn't exceptionally fast, the Poco C65's larger battery will take approximately 2.5 to 3 hours for a full charge from 0%. The Narzo N63, with its 45W charging, can potentially achieve a full charge in under an hour, assuming similar battery capacity.
❓ Is the Poco C65's display bright enough to comfortably use outdoors on a sunny day?
Yes, the Poco C65's measured peak brightness of 607 nits is sufficient for comfortable outdoor use, even in direct sunlight. This is a significant advantage over phones with dimmer displays.
❓ Does the Narzo N63 support reverse charging, allowing it to charge other devices?
Based on available information, the Narzo N63 does not appear to support reverse charging. This feature is typically found on higher-end smartphones.
