The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo N63 and Samsung Galaxy A15 are two strong contenders. The Narzo N63 prioritizes fast charging, while the Galaxy A15 focuses on a brighter display and a more efficient chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specs to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a more responsive experience, the Samsung Galaxy A15 is the better choice. Its Helio G99 chipset, coupled with a measured 808 nits of brightness, provides a smoother user experience and better visibility outdoors, despite the slower 25W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 06 | 2023, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 10 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.7 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) | 160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g or 191 g (6.67 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Leather Blue, Twilight Purple | Brave Black, Optimistic Blue, Magical Blue, Personality Yellow |
| Models | - | SM-A155F, SM-A155F/DSN, SM-A155M, SM-A155M/DS, SM-A155P, SM-A155R |
| Price | About 90 EUR | € 168.99 / $ 125.00 / £ 113.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo N63
- 45W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially lower price point
- Unisoc chipset offers decent efficiency
- Less powerful processor compared to the Helio G99
- Likely lower display brightness
- Unknown battery capacity may limit endurance
Samsung Galaxy A15
- Brighter 808 nit display for outdoor visibility
- More powerful and efficient Helio G99 chipset
- Impressive 15:28h active use battery life
- Slower 25W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A15 boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 808 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point in this price segment. While the Narzo N63’s display specs are not provided, it’s unlikely to match the A15’s brightness. The A15’s panel likely offers a more pleasant viewing experience in direct sunlight. We expect both to use LCD panels, but the A15’s brightness is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device beyond the presence of a 2MP macro lens (which is generally of limited utility), it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Samsung’s generally strong image processing algorithms, the Galaxy A15 is likely to produce more consistently pleasing photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The larger sensor size (if present, which is typical for Samsung A-series phones) would also contribute to better low-light performance. We assume both phones will have a primary camera, but the quality of that sensor is the key factor.
Performance
The Mediatek Helio G99 in the Galaxy A15, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm) in the Narzo N63. The G99’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, are more powerful than the Narzo’s A75 cores at 1.8 GHz. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the G99’s architecture provides a tangible performance boost.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A15 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 15 hours and 28 minutes of active use. While the Narzo N63’s battery capacity is unknown, the A15’s longevity is impressive. The Narzo N63 attempts to compensate with 45W wired charging, significantly faster than the A15’s 25W. This means the Narzo N63 can replenish its battery much quicker, but the A15’s longer runtime reduces the need for frequent charging. The trade-off is between speed of charge and total usage time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo N63 if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to trade some processing power for it. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 if you prioritize a brighter, more visible display, longer battery life during active use, and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Galaxy A15 get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G99 is designed with thermal efficiency in mind, utilizing a 6nm process. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, it's less prone to significant throttling compared to older or less efficient chipsets. The A15's thermal design should manage heat adequately for casual to moderate gaming.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Realme Narzo N63 significantly faster in real-world use?
Yes, 45W charging is noticeably faster than 25W. While the exact 0-100% time isn't specified, you can expect the Narzo N63 to gain a substantial charge in a shorter period, making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost. However, the A15's longer battery life may reduce the need for frequent charging.
❓ How does the Unisoc Tiger T612 perform with multitasking and demanding apps?
The Unisoc Tiger T612 is a capable chipset for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light app usage. However, it may struggle with heavy multitasking or demanding applications compared to the more powerful Helio G99. Expect some slowdowns when running multiple resource-intensive apps simultaneously.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones offer limited utility. Image quality is often subpar, lacking detail and sharpness. They are best used in ideal lighting conditions and should not be expected to produce professional-looking macro shots. The primary camera on either phone will deliver far superior results for most photography needs.
