The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo N55 and Samsung Galaxy M14 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy M14 takes the crown thanks to its significantly more powerful processor and more efficient 5nm chipset. While the Narzo N55 boasts impressive battery endurance and fast charging, the M14's overall performance and future-proofing make it the better pick for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2023, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 13 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 166.8 x 77.2 x 9.4 mm (6.57 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, One UI core 5.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min | 15W wired - international
25W wired - India |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prime Black, Prime Blue | Navy Blue, Light Blue, Silver |
| Models | - | SM-M146B, SM-M146B/DS, SM-M146B/DSN |
| Price | About 120 EUR | ₹ 10,990 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.48 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 123h
| - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Realme Narzo N55
- Exceptional battery life
- Fast 33W charging
- Good value for money
- Decent display
- Less powerful processor
- Mediocre camera performance
- Plastic build quality
Samsung Galaxy M14
- Powerful Exynos 1330 chipset
- Large battery capacity (6000mAh)
- Super AMOLED display (likely)
- Samsung's software support
- Slower charging speed (15W/25W)
- Plastic build quality
- Potentially less battery endurance than Narzo N55
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, but the Samsung Galaxy M14 likely has better color accuracy and viewing angles due to Samsung's display technology. The Narzo N55's contrast ratio of 1264:1 is respectable, but the M14's Super AMOLED panel (assumed) will offer a more vibrant and immersive visual experience. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy M14 likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and better image processing. While the Narzo N55's camera is adequate, the M14 is expected to deliver better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Specific megapixel counts are needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
This is where the Galaxy M14 shines. The Exynos 1330 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm) in the Narzo N55. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the M14. The M14's Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant performance boost.
Battery Life
The Narzo N55 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting exceptional battery life. However, the Galaxy M14's larger battery capacity (typically 6000mAh) and more efficient chipset could still result in comparable or even better real-world battery performance. The Narzo N55's 33W charging is faster than the M14's 15W (international) / 25W (India).
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo N55 is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and fast charging above all else, and those who don't demand high-end performance. The Samsung Galaxy M14 is a better choice for those seeking a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for multitasking and gaming, and appreciate Samsung's software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful processor and efficient chipset.
❓ Does the Galaxy M14 support 5G?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy M14 supports 5G connectivity.