Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The Realme Narzo N53 offers a compelling budget option, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 is a well-regarded mid-range contender. Let's break down their key differences to help you decide which one best fits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner overall, boasting a superior chipset, brighter display, and better camera. However, the Realme Narzo N53 provides excellent value for budget-conscious buyers seeking fast charging and a decent experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 18 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 22 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI T | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | RMX3761 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo N53
- Fast 33W Charging
- Budget-Friendly
- Decent Performance for Basic Tasks
- Sleek Design (likely)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Quality Display
- Less Capable Camera
- Plastic Build (likely)
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Powerful Exynos 1380 Chipset
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Excellent Camera System
- Premium Build Quality
- Long Battery Life
- Slower 25W Charging
- Higher Price
- Software Updates can be slow (sometimes)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54’s display shines with a measured peak brightness of 980 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Narzo N53 likely has a standard LCD panel, which will be less bright and have a lower contrast ratio, resulting in a less immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54’s camera system is expected to be superior, offering better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. While the Narzo N53 will likely have a capable camera for basic photography, it won't match the A54's capabilities. Specific megapixel counts are not provided, but Samsung's image processing is generally more refined.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is significantly more powerful than the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the Narzo N53. The A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable performance boost for demanding tasks and gaming, while the N53 will handle everyday tasks adequately but may struggle with heavier applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating exceptional endurance ratings (11:15h active use, 119h standby). The Narzo N53’s 33W charging is faster than the A54’s 25W, potentially offsetting any slight difference in battery capacity.
Buying Guide
The Realme Narzo N53 is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize fast charging and basic smartphone functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a more premium experience with a better camera, faster performance, and a vibrant display, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Realme Narzo N53 good for gaming?
The Narzo N53 can handle basic games, but it may struggle with demanding titles due to its less powerful chipset. The Galaxy A54 is a better choice for gamers.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally provides longer software update support for its Galaxy A series devices compared to Realme.
