The Realme Narzo 80 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range to upper-mid-range smartphone market. The Narzo 80 Pro brings MediaTek’s latest Dimensity 7400 to the table, while the Poco F5 Pro leverages the established power of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a proven track record, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers a noticeable performance edge, especially in demanding tasks. However, the Narzo 80 Pro’s 80W charging and potentially more efficient Dimensity 7400 make it a strong contender for those valuing fast refueling and potentially better thermal management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 09 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 09 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.41 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 21 min
Reverse wired
Bypass charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Racing Green, Speed Silver | Black, White |
| Models | - | 23013PC75G |
| Price | ₹ 18,998 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Realme Narzo 80 Pro
- 80W SuperVOOC charging is exceptionally fast.
- MediaTek Dimensity 7400 offers potential efficiency gains.
- Reverse wired charging adds convenience.
- Camera specifications are currently unknown.
- Performance likely trails the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers superior performance.
- High peak brightness (1059 nits) for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Proven track record of Qualcomm’s ISP for image processing.
- Charging speed (67W) is slower than the Narzo 80 Pro.
- No reverse wireless charging.
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1059 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Narzo 80 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, the F5 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience for media consumption. The lack of LTPO technology in either phone means refresh rate scaling isn't as power efficient as on flagship devices, but the F5 Pro’s brightness advantage is a significant differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing for the Narzo 80 Pro. The Poco F5 Pro’s camera system likely benefits from Qualcomm’s ISP, offering strong image processing. Without specifics on the Narzo 80 Pro’s sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The absence of details suggests a focus on software optimization rather than hardware superiority in this area for the Narzo 80 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, designed for peak performance, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores. This contrasts with the Narzo 80 Pro’s Dimensity 7400 (4nm), utilizing Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture is demonstrably more powerful, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. The Narzo 80 Pro’s Dimensity 7400 aims for efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load due to reduced thermal throttling, but will likely fall behind in raw benchmark scores.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging approaches. The Poco F5 Pro offers 67W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes) and 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes). The Narzo 80 Pro significantly ups the ante with 80W wired charging (50% in 21 minutes), offering a faster top-up time. The Narzo 80 Pro also includes reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Poco F5 Pro, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 80 Pro if you need exceptionally fast charging (80W) and are interested in experiencing the latest MediaTek Dimensity 7400 chipset, potentially benefiting from improved efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize maximum performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the established reliability of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 platform, alongside a bright, high-contrast display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7400 in the Narzo 80 Pro get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7400’s 4nm process and focus on efficiency suggest it will manage thermals better than older flagship chips. However, without extensive testing, it’s difficult to definitively say. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while powerful, is known to generate more heat, potentially leading to throttling after extended gameplay.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro significantly slower than the 80W on the Narzo 80 Pro in real-world use?
While the Narzo 80 Pro charges faster on paper (50% in 21 minutes vs. 15 minutes for the Poco F5 Pro), the difference in practical terms may not be massive. Both phones offer quick top-ups, and the convenience of wireless charging on the Poco F5 Pro adds another dimension to its charging versatility.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the Poco F5 Pro and the Narzo 80 Pro?
The Poco F5 Pro leverages Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its accurate color reproduction and detail preservation. Without detailed camera specs for the Narzo 80 Pro, it’s difficult to compare. Realme typically focuses on vibrant, social media-ready images, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look.
