The Realme Narzo 80 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Narzo 80 Pro focuses on raw processing power with the newer Dimensity 7400, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a balanced experience with a focus on battery endurance and display quality. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and faster charging, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7400 chipset and 80W charging offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo provides excellent battery life and a brighter display, making it a strong contender for those valuing longevity and visual clarity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 09 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 09 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.41 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 21 min
Reverse wired
Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Racing Green, Speed Silver | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 18,998 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Realme Narzo 80 Pro
- Faster processor (Dimensity 7400)
- Faster charging (80W)
- Potentially better thermal management (4nm process)
- Battery life potentially lower than Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness unknown, potentially lower
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Faster 0-50% charging time (15 minutes)
- Slightly less powerful processor (Dimensity 7030)
- 6nm process may lead to more heat
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Narzo 80 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While the Narzo 80 Pro’s panel specifications are unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness suggests a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. Both devices likely employ AMOLED panels, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness and potential for higher color accuracy give it an edge for multimedia enthusiasts.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones are expected to feature multi-camera systems, but specifics are missing. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the focus should be on the primary sensor capabilities, as auxiliary lenses (like the often-present 2MP macro) contribute little to overall image quality. Image processing algorithms will also play a significant role, and brand reputation suggests Motorola may offer more natural-looking photos, while Realme often boosts saturation.
Performance
The Realme Narzo 80 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) offers a performance advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Narzo 80 Pro’s CPU configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) also features a slightly higher peak clock speed compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), suggesting faster single-core performance. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80h. While the Narzo 80 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s longevity is a significant benefit for users who prioritize all-day battery life. The Narzo 80 Pro compensates with 80W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in 21 minutes, while the Edge 40 Neo takes 15 minutes. This faster charging speed mitigates the potential disadvantage of a smaller battery (if applicable) and provides quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 80 Pro if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a more refined software experience. The Edge 40 Neo is ideal for users who don't push their phones to the absolute limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7400 in the Narzo 80 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7400's 4nm process should mitigate thermal throttling better than the Edge 40 Neo's 6nm Dimensity 7030. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. Realme's thermal management implementation will be crucial; reviews will provide real-world insights into throttling behavior.
❓ Is the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo fast enough for daily use?
Yes, 68W charging is quite fast, reaching 50% in 15 minutes. While not as rapid as the Narzo 80 Pro’s 80W, it’s still significantly faster than standard charging and should provide sufficient top-ups throughout the day, especially given the Edge 40 Neo’s excellent battery life.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Realme UI and Motorola's My UX?
Realme UI is known for its customization options and feature-richness, but can sometimes feel bloated. Motorola's My UX aims for a cleaner, near-stock Android experience with minimal pre-installed apps and a focus on simplicity. Preference here is highly subjective.
