The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo 70x and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G represent compelling options. Both devices target users seeking a balance of features and affordability, but they take different approaches. The Narzo 70x prioritizes processing power with the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G focuses on extended battery life and faster charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery and rapid replenishment, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Narzo 70x’s 45W, and the 11:36h active use score demonstrates impressive endurance. However, gamers and power users may lean towards the Narzo 70x for its more modern chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 24 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Blue, Forest Green | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Models | - | 23117RA68G, 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | About 120 EUR | € 92.00 / $ 269.99 / £ 299.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 70x
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 6100+)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Modern 6nm process node for efficiency
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Battery life data unavailable, potentially lower than Redmi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- Excellent battery life (11:36h active use)
- Faster charging (67W, 50% in 16 min)
- Brighter display (1047 nits)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G99 Ultra)
- Potentially lower performance in demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1047 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Narzo 70x’s display specifications aren’t provided, the Redmi’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels given the market segment, but the Redmi’s higher peak brightness is a clear win for content consumption in bright environments. Bezels and color accuracy are assumed to be comparable without further data.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the focus should be on the main sensor. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s inclusion of photo and video capabilities suggests a more versatile camera experience, while the Narzo 70x’s camera performance remains largely unknown. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and night mode, but image quality will depend heavily on the sensor and image processing algorithms.
Performance
Both the Realme Narzo 70x and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G are equipped with octa-core CPUs featuring the same core configuration: 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the key difference lies in the chipset: the Narzo 70x uses the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm), while the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G utilizes the Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra. The Dimensity 6100+ benefits from a more modern architecture and a smaller 6nm process node, suggesting better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load. This means the Narzo 70x is likely to handle graphically intensive tasks and multitasking more smoothly, particularly over extended periods.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G excels in battery performance, achieving an impressive 11:36h active use score. This indicates excellent power efficiency and long-lasting battery life. While the Narzo 70x’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Redmi’s endurance is a significant advantage. Furthermore, the Redmi supports 67W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 16 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes. The Narzo 70x’s 45W charging, while respectable, takes 30 minutes to reach 50%, highlighting the Redmi’s faster charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70x if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps and light gaming with a more responsive experience. Its Dimensity 6100+ chipset offers a performance edge. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G if you prefer a phone that lasts all day on a single charge and can be quickly topped up, making it ideal for users who prioritize convenience and battery anxiety.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Helio G99 Ultra is a capable chipset, it may require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. The Narzo 70x with its Dimensity 6100+ will likely offer a more consistent frame rate at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G compared to the 45W charging on the Narzo 70x in real-world use?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s 67W charging can add approximately 30% battery in the time it takes the Narzo 70x to reach 50%. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the camera on the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G good enough for casual social media photography?
Based on Xiaomi’s track record, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s camera should be perfectly adequate for casual social media photography in good lighting conditions. However, low-light performance may be limited without further details on the sensor and image processing.
