The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme Narzo 70x and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both devices aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches, primarily centered around chipset choice and charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides a substantial performance uplift, particularly for gaming and demanding applications. While the Narzo 70x offers competitive 45W charging, the X6 Pro’s 67W charging and superior processor outweigh this advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 24 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Blue, Forest Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 120 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 70x
- Competitive 45W fast charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Sleek design (assumed based on Realme branding)
- Less powerful Dimensity 6100+ chipset
- Limited information on display brightness and refresh rate
- Unspecified battery capacity
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly faster Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Brighter 1148 nit display
- Faster 67W charging with QC2.0/PD3.0 support
- Potentially higher price point
- May run warmer under sustained load (though 4nm helps)
- Software experience can be heavily customized (MIUI)
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Narzo 70x, which lacks published brightness data. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (a reasonable assumption for this segment), the X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of refresh rate information for the Narzo 70x is a notable omission, while the X6 Pro is expected to have a 120Hz panel, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited for the Narzo 70x. The Poco X6 Pro’s camera capabilities are likely to be more robust, benefiting from the processing power of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra. While the Narzo 70x may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the X6 Pro is expected to excel in low-light scenarios and provide more versatile video recording options. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes a direct comparison difficult, but it's a feature commonly found in this price range on Xiaomi devices.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Narzo 70x’s Dimensity 6100+ (6nm). The 8300 Ultra features a more advanced CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core alongside 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 cores – compared to the Narzo 70x’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This means the X6 Pro will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and consistency.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:46h. While the Narzo 70x’s battery capacity is unspecified, the X6 Pro’s longer runtime suggests a more efficient combination of hardware and software optimization. Furthermore, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0, allows for a full charge in 45 minutes, significantly faster than the Narzo 70x’s 45W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 50%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70x if you prioritize a balance of features and fast charging at the lowest possible price point, and your primary use case doesn't involve intensive gaming or heavy multitasking. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand superior performance for gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive apps, and you value faster charging speeds and a brighter display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chip, the 4nm manufacturing process helps mitigate heat generation. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings will inevitably lead to some warming. The Poco X6 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions to prevent significant throttling, but expect some performance reduction after extended play.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Realme Narzo 70x slow compared to the Poco X6 Pro's 67W?
Yes, 45W is noticeably slower than 67W. While the Narzo 70x reaches 50% charge in 30 minutes, the X6 Pro can fully charge in 45 minutes. For users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, the X6 Pro’s faster charging is a significant advantage.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Realme Narzo 70x with the Dimensity 6100+?
The Dimensity 6100+ is capable of handling most popular mobile games at medium settings. However, demanding titles like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty: Mobile may require lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's suitable for casual gamers but may not provide the optimal experience for hardcore mobile gamers.
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro support expandable storage via microSD card?
Unfortunately, Xiaomi typically does not include microSD card slots in their Poco X series devices. Therefore, it's unlikely the Poco X6 Pro supports expandable storage. Users should carefully consider their storage needs when purchasing and opt for a model with sufficient internal capacity.
