The Realme Narzo 70x and vivo V30 SE represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$250 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches to achieving it – the Narzo 70x prioritizing raw processing power with the Dimensity 6100+, while the V30 SE focuses on efficiency with the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and slightly faster charging, the Realme Narzo 70x emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 6100+ chipset offers a noticeable edge in CPU-intensive tasks, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. However, the vivo V30 SE’s efficiency is a strong counterpoint.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, May 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 24 | Available. Released 2024, May 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic or silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 185.5 g or 191 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 44W wired, 50% in 25 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Blue, Forest Green | Crystal Black, Leather Purple |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Realme Narzo 70x
- More powerful CPU for demanding tasks
- Slightly faster charging speed
- Potentially better multitasking performance
- Likely less power efficient
- May run warmer under sustained load
vivo V30 SE
- More power-efficient chipset
- Potentially cooler operation
- Qualcomm ISP for potentially better image processing
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Narzo 70x
- Slightly slower charging speed
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internals, we can infer both likely feature similar 6.67-inch FHD+ LCD panels common in this price bracket. The key difference will likely be color calibration and peak brightness, areas where vivo historically performs well. However, without specific display specs, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner. Expect standard 60Hz refresh rates on both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera around the 50MP mark, with the V30 SE potentially benefiting from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) for improved image processing. The Narzo 70x might lean towards more vibrant, saturated colors, typical of Realme’s tuning. Expect both to include standard auxiliary lenses (depth, macro) of limited utility. The 4nm Snapdragon’s ISP could offer better low-light performance, but this is speculative without further data.
Performance
The core battleground lies in the chipsets. The Realme Narzo 70x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, offering a performance advantage over the vivo V30 SE’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) which uses Cortex-A78 cores at the same 2.2 GHz. While both have six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Dimensity’s A76 cores are generally more powerful. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm process *should* translate to better power efficiency, potentially mitigating the performance gap in real-world usage. The Narzo 70x will likely excel in benchmarks and demanding apps, while the V30 SE will offer smoother, more consistent performance over extended periods.
Battery Life
Both devices offer similar charging speeds – 45W for the Narzo 70x and 44W for the V30 SE. The Narzo 70x claims 50% charge in 30 minutes, while the V30 SE achieves the same in 25 minutes. This suggests slightly faster charging on the Realme. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s superior efficiency could offset the slightly slower charging speed, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. Without knowing the battery capacity of each device, it’s difficult to definitively say which will last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70x if you need a phone capable of handling heavier multitasking, enjoy occasional gaming, and value a slightly faster charging experience. Buy the vivo V30 SE if you prioritize all-day battery life, appreciate a more power-efficient chipset, and prefer a potentially cooler running device during extended use. Both phones are excellent choices for media consumption and everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 6100+ in the Narzo 70x overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 6100+ is a capable chipset, its 6nm process isn't as efficient as the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2's 4nm node. Expect some thermal throttling during extended gaming, but Realme's cooling solutions may mitigate this. The V30 SE will likely maintain cooler temperatures for longer.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo V30 SE offer sufficient performance for popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is more than capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings. While it won't deliver the highest frame rates, it will provide a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience, especially when paired with optimized software.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 44W and 45W?
The difference is minimal. Both phones achieve 50% charge in roughly 25-30 minutes. The real-world impact on daily usage will be negligible. The more important factor is the overall charging efficiency and battery capacity, which are not fully specified.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited image quality. They are often included for marketing purposes but rarely deliver truly impressive results. Expect soft details and limited dynamic range. The primary camera will almost always produce better results, even when digitally zoomed.
