The Realme Narzo 70x and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Narzo 70x aims to deliver strong performance at an aggressive price point, while the Galaxy A55 focuses on a well-rounded experience with Samsung’s established software and display expertise. This comparison dives deep into the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. Its Exynos 1480 chipset, coupled with a measured 13:27h active use score, provides a more consistent and reliable experience, despite the Narzo 70x’s faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 24 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Blue, Forest Green | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | - | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 70x
- Faster 45W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially stronger multi-core performance
- Aggressive pricing for the hardware offered
- Less efficient 6nm chipset
- Likely inferior display quality
- Uncertainty regarding camera performance and software support
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Superior battery life (13:27h active use)
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1010 nits)
- More efficient 4nm Exynos 1480 chipset
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May not offer the absolute fastest CPU performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits. This translates to excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a scenario where the Narzo 70x’s display will likely struggle. While the Narzo 70x’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s Super AMOLED technology is known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A55’s panel is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience, especially for video content. We expect the A55 to also have better viewing angles and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Narzo 70x, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically prioritizes image processing and consistency across its A-series devices. The Galaxy A55 likely benefits from Samsung’s advanced computational photography algorithms, resulting in more natural-looking photos in various lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding OIS on the Narzo 70x suggests the A55 will have a clear advantage in low-light photography and video stabilization. We can assume both phones will include a standard wide and ultrawide lens, but the A55’s image processing will likely be more refined.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480, fabricated on a 4nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Realme Narzo 70x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm). The A55’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – provides a substantial performance uplift in single-core tasks compared to the Narzo 70x’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. While both utilize Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the 4nm node of the Exynos 1480 translates to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Narzo 70x will likely excel in multi-threaded tasks, but the A55’s superior single-core performance will be more noticeable in everyday app responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s 13:27h active use score demonstrates a significant advantage in battery endurance. While the Narzo 70x offers faster 45W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes), the A55’s superior efficiency, stemming from the 4nm Exynos 1480, allows it to operate for a longer duration on a single charge. The A55’s 25W charging, while slower, is still adequate for overnight top-ups. The Narzo 70x’s faster charging is beneficial for users who frequently need a quick power boost, but the A55’s longer runtime will be more appreciated by those who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70x if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks and faster charging speeds, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you value a superior display, longer battery life in real-world usage, and Samsung’s robust software ecosystem with guaranteed updates. The A55 is ideal for media consumption and everyday productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480, built on a 4nm process, is generally efficient and well-managed in the Galaxy A55. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, Samsung’s thermal management system is designed to prevent significant throttling, ensuring consistent performance over extended periods. It's less prone to overheating than older Exynos chips.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Narzo 70x significantly faster in real-world use compared to the A55's 25W?
Yes, the Narzo 70x’s 45W charging will noticeably reduce charging times. It can reach 50% charge in approximately 30 minutes, while the A55 will take considerably longer. However, the A55’s superior battery efficiency means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Realme UI and Samsung's One UI?
Samsung’s One UI is known for its polished interface, extensive features, and long-term software support (typically 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security patches). Realme UI, while improving, often includes more pre-installed bloatware and may have a shorter software support lifecycle. One UI generally offers a more refined and consistent user experience.
❓ Will the Narzo 70x be able to run demanding games like Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Narzo 70x’s Dimensity 6100+ is capable of running Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile, but you may need to lower graphics settings to achieve consistently smooth frame rates. The Exynos 1480 in the A55 will likely provide a more stable and higher-fidelity gaming experience, especially at higher settings.
