The Realme Narzo 70x and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Narzo 70x focuses on delivering a solid all-around experience with a focus on charging speed, while the Edge 50 Fusion aims to elevate the experience with a brighter display and a more powerful (in some regions) chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specifications and performance to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is the stronger choice. Its 68W charging and significantly brighter 1322 nit display outweigh the Narzo 70x’s slightly lower price point. However, the Narzo 70x remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 24 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Blue, Forest Green | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | - | XT2429-1 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
Realme Narzo 70x
- Competitive price point
- Efficient Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ chipset
- Respectable 45W fast charging
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Significantly brighter 1322 nit display
- Faster 68W wired charging
- Potentially superior performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International)
- May be more expensive than the Narzo 70x
- LATAM variant uses a less powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1322 nits, a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Narzo 70x. This translates to significantly better outdoor visibility. While the Narzo 70x’s panel specifications aren’t detailed, it’s likely to be a standard LCD or lower-tier AMOLED, lacking the brightness and color accuracy of the Fusion. The Edge 50 Fusion’s higher brightness also suggests a more advanced panel technology, potentially with better contrast and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, focusing on the chipsets, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Edge 50 Fusion benefits from a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The Narzo 70x’s Dimensity 6100+ is capable, but likely won’t match the Fusion’s processing capabilities. We can assume both phones will include a standard main camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the quality will heavily depend on sensor size and software optimization.
Performance
The chipset is where the biggest divergence lies. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion ships with either the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International) or the SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (LATAM). The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant performance uplift over the Realme Narzo 70x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm). The 7s Gen 2 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores (4x2.40 GHz) versus the Narzo’s Cortex-A76 (2x2.2 GHz) – resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The LATAM variant of the Edge 50 Fusion, with the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, will see a performance decrease, but still likely match or exceed the Narzo 70x in most tasks. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon chips also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Realme Narzo 70x’s 45W charging, while respectable, takes 30 minutes to reach the same 50% level. The Edge 50 Fusion also boasts an impressive 12:40h active use score, indicating excellent battery life. While the Narzo 70x’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging and longer active use time of the Fusion suggest a more efficient power management system and potentially a larger battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70x if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on efficient power management and are comfortable with a slightly less vibrant display. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prioritize a brighter, more immersive viewing experience, faster charging speeds, and potentially better performance, especially if you acquire the international version with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 variant of the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion significantly impact gaming performance?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is noticeably less powerful than the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. While still capable of handling most mobile games, you'll likely experience lower frame rates and reduced graphical settings in demanding titles. The Narzo 70x may offer comparable gaming performance to the LATAM Edge 50 Fusion.
❓ How does the charging speed difference translate to real-world usage between the Narzo 70x and Edge 50 Fusion?
The Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W charging allows for a substantial top-up in a short amount of time – 50% in 15 minutes. This is ideal for users who frequently need to quickly recharge their phone. The Narzo 70x’s 45W charging is still fast, but requires 30 minutes for the same 50% charge, making it less convenient for quick boosts.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The 1322 nits peak brightness of the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion makes a significant difference, especially when viewing content outdoors or in brightly lit environments. The Narzo 70x’s display will likely appear washed out in comparison under similar conditions.
