The Realme Narzo 70 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches, particularly in chipset selection and charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides a significant performance advantage, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Narzo 70 offers respectable charging speeds, the X6 Pro’s superior processing power justifies its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 27 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Olive Green, Sky Blue | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | RMX3869 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Realme Narzo 70
- Faster 45W charging speeds
- Potentially more streamlined software experience
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less efficient CPU architecture
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Brighter 1148 nit display
- Faster 67W charging with QC/PD support
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially more aggressive image processing
- Larger size and weight (assumed)
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Narzo 70, making the X6 Pro far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Narzo 70’s panel specifications aren’t provided, the X6 Pro’s brightness suggests a higher-quality panel. The X6 Pro’s brightness also implies a more efficient panel, potentially impacting battery life positively. We can assume both devices use AMOLED technology given the market segment, but the X6 Pro’s brightness is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited regarding camera specifics for both devices. However, given the price points, we can anticipate similar sensor configurations focusing on versatility. The X6 Pro’s potential for better image processing stems from its more powerful chipset, enabling faster and more complex algorithms. The Narzo 70 may prioritize a more color-accurate, natural look, while the X6 Pro might lean towards more vibrant, social media-ready images. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X6 Pro’s processing power gives it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco X6 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) versus the Narzo 70’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained peak performance. The CPU architecture also favors the X6 Pro; its Cortex-A715 cores (1x3.35 GHz & 3x3.20 GHz) are more powerful than the Narzo 70’s Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.6 GHz). This difference will be most noticeable in graphically intensive games and demanding applications. The Narzo 70’s Cortex-A55 cores (6x2.0 GHz) are also less efficient than the X6 Pro’s Cortex-A510 cores (4x2.20 GHz).
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates superior real-world battery performance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Narzo 70’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the X6 Pro’s endurance is impressive. The X6 Pro also features 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support, promising a full charge in 45 minutes. The Narzo 70’s 45W charging, while respectable, is slower. The X6 Pro’s faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The combination of efficient chipset and fast charging gives the X6 Pro a clear advantage in battery-related features.
Buying Guide
Buy the Realme Narzo 70 if you prioritize fast charging and a streamlined user experience, and are less concerned with pushing the absolute limits of mobile gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing, and value a brighter, more vibrant display. The X6 Pro is the clear choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions?
While the 4nm process helps with thermal efficiency, demanding games will inevitably generate heat. However, the X6 Pro’s larger surface area and potentially more sophisticated cooling system (details not provided) should mitigate throttling better than the Narzo 70, allowing for sustained performance over longer periods.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Realme Narzo 70 sufficient for daily use, or is the 67W on the Poco X6 Pro a must-have?
45W charging is adequate for most users, but the 67W on the Poco X6 Pro significantly reduces charging time. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery, the X6 Pro’s faster charging is a worthwhile advantage.
❓ How does the CPU architecture difference (Cortex-A78 vs A715) translate to real-world app loading times?
The Cortex-A715 cores in the Poco X6 Pro are a generation newer and more efficient than the A78 cores in the Narzo 70. This translates to faster app launch speeds, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience, particularly with demanding applications.
